Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 23;15(3):e0230417. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230417

Fig 1. Categorizing patients into low versus high-intensity surveillance based on consensus guideline recommendations and length of the surveillance window.

Fig 1

[3] At the top of the figure, the timeline of the surveillance window is depicted in months. X denotes the recommended time of cystoscopy. A 1.5 month grace period was allotted to allow for surveillance cystoscopies that were done slightly later than recommended. For example, a patient followed for 9.5 months (second column) who underwent 0 or 1 cystoscopies was categorized as low-intensity surveillance, whereas a patient followed for 9.5 months who underwent 2 or more cystoscopies was categorized as high-intensity surveillance. In the table, the number of patients categorized into low versus high-intensity surveillance (overall and stratified by length of surveillance window), and number of surveillance cystoscopies is depicted.