Table 2.

fMRI handwriting results for poor writers

Brain region	Ave. Z	MNI X	MNI Y	MNI Z	Brodmann
L Posterior Cingulum	2.401	−12	−52	28	0
L Calcarine	2.577	−4	−84	−14	17
R Calcarine	2.553	10	−94	8	17
L Cuneus	2.583	−4	−80	32	18
R Cuneus	2.614	12	−92	12	18
L Lingual	2.77	−20	−76	−14	18
R Lingual	2.576	2	−74	−6	17
L Superior Occipital	2.763	−14	−94	0	18
L Middle Occipital	2.809	−12	−96	−2	18
L Fusiform	2.748	−22	−76	−16	18
L Superior Parietal	2.522	−20	−62	38	7
L Precuneus	2.588	−2	−80	44	7
R Precuneus	2.522	2	−80	44	0
L Cerebellum Crus1	2.698	−6	−84	−18	18
R Cerebellum Crus1	2.585	16	−72	−34	0
R Cerebellum Crus2	2.611	6	−68	−32	0
R Cerebellum 4_5	2.823	8	−58	−24	0
L Cerebellum 6	2.864	−6	−80	−16	18
R Cerebellum 6	2.853	28	−46	−34	37
L Cerebellum 8	2.508	−10	−62	−42	0
R Cerebellum 8	2.664	16	−64	−60	0
R Cerebellum 9	2.394	16	−44	−42	0
Vermis 4_5	2.754	6	−60	−20	18
Vermis 6	3.09	4	−62	−24	0
Vermis 7	2.996	4	−66	−28	0
Vermis 8	2.862	4	−60	−28	0
Vermis 9	2.427	6	−56	−32	0

Brain regions within FSL significant clusters for novel letter > familar letter contrast for poor writers (n = 8)