Table 3.
ANT: mean response times and accuracy by group, phase, and task condition/effect
| Interpretation students | Translation students | Non-language students | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response time (ms) | Accuracy (%) | Response time (ms) | Accuracy (%) | Response time (ms) | Accuracy (%) | |
| Phase 1 | ||||||
| Congruent | 447 (65) | 99.2 (0.9) | 501 (133) | 99.4 (0.6) | 452 (49) | 98.7 (1.7) |
| Incongruent | 521 (68) | 95.8 (4.6) | 553 (115) | 98.4 (2.4) | 527 (55) | 93.0 (6.0) |
| Conflict effect | 73 (21) | 3.4 (4.5) | 52 (25) | 1.0 (2.3) | 76 (20) | 5.8 (5.4) |
| Alerting effect | 13 (16) | 0.0 (2.0) | 16 (20) | 0.7 (1.2) | 7 (14) | 0.6 (3.6) |
| Orienting effect | 9 (15) | 0.6 (2.5) | 1 (27) | 0.9 (1.2) | 12 (14) | 0.8 (2.7) |
| Phase 2 | ||||||
| Congruent | 413 (48) | 98.9 (1.2) | 429 (39) | 99.2 (0.5) | 397 (45) | 98.2 (2.6) |
| Incongruent | 484 (56) | 93.4 (6.1) | 492 (37) | 98.4 (2.2) | 468 (50) | 87.7 (10.4) |
| Conflict effect | 71 (23) | 5.5 (5.8) | 63 (7) | 0.8 (2.5) | 71 (21) | 10.5 (9.2) |
| Alerting effect | 10 (14) | −0.5 (2.3) | 9 (11) | 0.2 (2.5) | 7 (14) | 0.4 (3.3) |
| Orienting effect | 9 (14) | 0.0 (2.8) | 2 (10) | −0.9 (1.8) | 8 (13) | 0.2 (3.5) |
Values in parentheses are standard deviations. The data reported above are for the students who participated longitudinally