Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 27;1(3):254–267. doi: 10.1007/s41465-017-0011-x

Table 4.

Task-switching paradigm: mean response times and accuracy by group, phase, and task condition/effect

Interpretation students Translation students Non-language students
Response time (ms) Accuracy (%) Response time (ms) Accuracy (%) Response time (ms) Accuracy (%)
Phase 1
 Single task 469 (87) 98.1 (2.5) 514 (98) 99.3 (1.5) 487 (52) 97.7 (2.5)
 Repetition 773 (202) 97.4 (2.2) 811 (222) 98.0 (2.3) 806 (169) 96.5 (2.3)
 Switch 929 (269) 95.0 (4.5) 990 (270) 95.1 (3.8) 960 (207) 94.0 (4.1)
 Mixing cost 304 (156) 0.7 (2.6) 297 (158) 1.4 (2.6) 320 (158) 1.2 (2.5)
 Switching cost 155 (101) 2.4 (3.8) 179 (95) 2.9 (2.6) 154 (85) 2.5 (3.4)
Phase 2
 Single task 423 (66) 98.1 (2.7) 422 (60) 97.6 (3.8) 445 (71) 97.6 (2.4)
 Repetition 666 (187) 97.3 (2.4) 640 (196) 96.4 (4.7) 673 (130) 95.9 (2.5)
 Switch 797 (250) 94.5 (4.8) 787 (253) 89.4 (7.7) 778 (150) 91.9 (4.6)
 Mixing cost 242 (141) 0.9 (2.5) 218 (146) 1.2 (2.4) 228 (107) 1.7 (3.8)
 Switching cost 131 (99) 2.7 (3.8) 147 (98) 7.0 (5.9) 105 (68) 4.0 (4.1)

Values in parentheses are standard deviations. The data reported above are for the students who participated longitudinally