AGE | SEX | EDU | SF | VLT-TR | VLT-DR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGE | 1 | −0.01 | −0.255 | −0.256 | −0.337 | −0.317 |
SEX | −0.01 | 1 | −0.409 | −0.216 | 0.182 | 0.25 |
EDU | −0.255 | −0.409 | 1 | 0.37 | 0.2 | 0.049 |
SF | −0.256 | −0.216 | 0.37 | 1 | 0.263 | 0.258 |
VLT-TR | −0.337 | 0.182 | 0.2 | 0.263 | 1 | 0.642 |
VLT-DR | −0.317 | 0.25 | 0.049 | 0.258 | 0.642 | 1 |
Kim, J., Jeong, J. H., Han, S. H., Ryu, H. J., Lee, J. Y., Ryu, S. H., ... & Choi, S. H. (2013). Relia;bility and validity of the short form of the literacy-independent cognitive assessment in the elderly. Journal of Clinical Neurology, 9(2), 111–117. doi:10.3988/jcn.2013.9.2.111
N = 639
Sex coding: female > male
Education coding: higher is better