Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 23;3:40. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0247-1

Table 2.

Characteristics of included studies in systematic review.

First author, reference Factor addressed of training /testing dataset Data points Training dataset Number of Images (training dataset) Testing dataset Number of images (testing dataset) Outcome measures Results Implications
Gulshan9 Dataset size (% of total training dataset of 103,698) (Training) 0.2% EyePACS 207 EyePACS 24,360 SP (at pre-set 97% SN)

SP

38%

60,000 Images may be the minimum training dataset size needed for maximum performance
2% 2073 61%
10% 10,369 77%
20% 20,739 86%
30% 31,109 91%
40% 41,479 98%
50% 51,849 100%
60% 62,218 96%
70% 72,588 97%
80% 82,958 100%
90% 93,328 99%
100% 103,698 100%
Mydriasis (testing) Mydriatic EyePACS 128,175 EyePACS-1 4236 SN SP

SN

89.6%

SP 97.9% Mydriasis may not be required for optimal performance
Non-Mydriatic 4534 90.9% 98.5%
Both 8770 90.1% 98.2%
Ting15 Retinal cameras (testing) Canon SiDRP 76,370 BES 1052 AUC SN SP

AUC

0.929

SN

94.4%

SP 88.5% Different types of retinal cameras do not affect the performance
Topcon CUHK 1254 0.948 99.3% 83.1%
Carl Zeiss HKU 7706 0.964 100% 81.3%
Fundus Vue Guangdong 15,798 0.949 98.7% 81.6%
Study type (testing) Clinic-based SiDRP 76,370 CUHK 1254 AUC SN SP

AUC

0.948

SN

99.3%

SP

83.1%

The study type does not affect the performance in detection of disease
Community-based BES 1052 0.929 94.4% 88.5%
Population-based Guangdong 15,798 0.949 98.7% 81.6%
Reference Standard (testing) Retinal Specialists SiDRP 76,370 CUHK 1254 AUC SN SP

AUC

0.948

SN

99.3%

SP

83.1%

If minimally professional graders with ≥7 years’ experience grade, performance may not be affected
Ophthalmologists BES 1052 0.929 94.4% 88.5%
Optometrists HKU 7706 0.964 100% 81.3%
Graders RVEEH 2302 0.983 98.9% 92.2%
Prevalence rate (testing) 5.5% (BES) SiDRP 76,370 BES 1052 AUC SN SP

AUC

0.929

SN

94.4%

SP

88.5%

Lower prevalence rate does not greatly affect performance
8.1% (SCES) SCES 1936 0.919 100% 76.3%
12.9% (AFEDS) AFEDS 1968 0.980 98.8% 86.5%
Concurrent diseases (testing) Mixed pathologies SiDRP 76,370 DR 37,001 AUC SN SP

AUC

0.936

SN

90.5%

SP

91.6%

Concurrent ocular pathologies in the same image does not affect the model’s detection of either disease
AMD 773 0.942 96.4% 87.2%
Glaucoma 56 0.931 93.2% 88.7%
Ethnicity (testing) Malay SiDRP 76,370 SIMES 3052 AUC SN SP

AUC

0.889

SN

97.1%

SP

82.0%

Despite difference in the retina between ethnicities, this does not influence the performance in detection
Indian SINDI 4512 0.917 99.3% 73.3%
Chinese SCES 1936 0.919 100% 76.3%
African American AFEDS 1968 0.980 98.8% 86.5%
White RVEEH 2302 0.983 98.9% 92.2%
Hispanic Mexico 1172 0.950 91.8% 84.8%
Bawankar31 Mydriasis (testing) Non-mydriasis (vs ETDRS mydriatic reference standard) Eye-PACS1, India 80,000 India 1084 SN SP

SN

91.2%

SP

96.9%

Despite no mydriasis of testing dataset, the DLS was able to perform highly when compared to mydriatic 7-field ETDRS grading reference standard
Burlina33 Dataset size (training) Real AREDS 119,090 AREDS 13,302 AUC AC

AUC

0.971

AC

91.1%

Creating proxy datasets using GANs may provide a solution to those with limited access to large number of images
Synthetic Image generated with GANs 119,090 0.924 82.9%
Sahlsten25 Image pixel size (training) 256×256 Digifundus Ltd (Finland) 24,806 Digifundus Ltd (Finland) 7118 AUC AUC0.961 Training with higher resolution images may improve performance
299×299 24,806 0.970
512×512 24,806 0.979
1024×1024 24,806 0.984
2095×2095 24,806 0.987
Bellemo32 Ethnicity (testing) African SiDRP 76,370 Zambia 4504 AUC SN SP

AUC

0.973

SN

92.3%

SP

89.0%

Differences in ethnicity between training and testing dataset does not affect performance
Ting34 Prevalence rate (testing) 4.1% (VTDR) SiDRP 76,370 Pooled dataset (SiDRP, SIMES, SINDI, SCES, BES, AFEDS, CUHK, DMP) 93,293 AUC

AUC

0.950

Prevalence rate of diseases may be estimated accurately by DLS
6.5% (RDR) 0.963
15.9% (ADR) 0.863

AUC area under curve of receiver operating curve, AC accuracy, SN sensitivity, SP specificity, EyePACS Eye Picture Archive Communication System, SiDRP Singapore’s National Integrated Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Program, BES Beijing Eye Study, CUHK Chinese University Hong Kong, HKU Hong Kong University, RVEEH Royal Victoria Eye and Ear Hospital, AFEDS African American Eye Disease Study, SCES Singapore Chinese Eye Study, SIMES Singapore Malay Eye Study, SINDI Singapore Indian Eye Study, DMP Diabetes Management Project Melbourne, DLS Deep Learning System, ETDRS Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study, AREDS Age-Related Eye Disease Study, DR diabetic retinopathy, AMD age-related macular degeneration, VTDR vision threatening diabetic retinopathy, RDR reference diabetic retinopathy, ADR any diabetic retinopathy, GAN Generative Adversarial Network.