Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 17;11:380. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00380

TABLE 2.

Effects of community type, microbiome inoculum, and recipient genotype on the taxonomic composition of microbial communities (Experiment 2).

Variable Df Sum of squares Mean squares F model R2 Pr (>F) Corrected p-value
(a) General PERMANOVA (BPK + GM)
Community type 1 4.05 4.05 30.02 0.28 0.001 0.002
Recipient genotype 1 0.79 0.79 5.87 0.05 0.002 0.003
Inoculum 3 2.05 0.68 5.05 0.14 0.001 0.002
Community × recipient genotype 1 0.64 0.64 4.71 0.04 0.001 0.002
Community × inoculum 3 1.20 0.40 2.95 0.08 0.002 0.003
Recipient genotype × inoculum 3 0.93 0.31 2.30 0.06 0.005 0.006
Community × recipient × inoculum 3 0.73 0.24 1.81 0.05 0.027 0.027
Residuals 31 4.19 0.16 0.29
Total 46 14.57 1.00
(b) PERMANOVA in BPK
Recipient genotype 1 0.81 0.81 7.65 0.15 0.001
Inoculum 3 1.77 0.59 5.59 0.34 0.001
Recipient genotype × inoculum 3 0.95 0.32 3.00 0.18 0.003
Residuals 1.69 0.11 0.32
Total 5.22 1.00
(c) PERMANOVA in GM
Recipient genotype 1 0.62 0.62 3.72 0.12 0.001
Inoculum 3 1.47 0.49 2.95 0.28 0.001
Recipient genotype × inoculum 3 0.72 0.24 1.43 0.13 0.044
Residuals 15 2.50 0.17 0.47
Total 22 5.30 1.00

PERMANOVA were performed on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity indices for BPK and GM simultaneously (a), BPK only (b), and GM only (c). p-values in the general analysis (a) were adjusted with the FDR method. Significant results (p < 0.05) are indicated in bold.