Table 1.
Protocol steps | Research activity |
A (data collection) | Recruit stakeholders and perform focus group interviews (two sessions) |
B (data collection) | Recruit patients |
C (data collection) | Collect post-serious gaming feedback from professional and patient users |
D (data collection) | Purposively select patients for semistructured interviews |
E (data collection) | Perform semistructured interviews with patients |
F (data collection) | Perform stakeholder focus group interview (third session) |
1 (analysis) | In iteration with steps E and F: Code intervention (I), context (C), mechanism (M), and outcome (O) elements in all the qualitative information Describe ICMO relationships per individual patient interview Compare patient-level findings with focus group data collected from other stakeholders |
2 (analysis) | Interpret mechanisms on the basis of formal theory (ie, adjudication) Formulate quantitatively testable hypotheses before outcome inspection |
G (data collection) | Retrieve quantitative data from patient records |
3 (analysis) | Describe quantitative data as a means to triangulate the qualitative results |
4 (analysis) | Test hypotheses with statistical models |
5 (analysis) | Mix the results of different methods: summarize how they are interpreted to support, refute, refine, or extend initial expectations Construct summary ICMO configurations (middle-range theory) based on findings of this study Propose a transferable program theory after comparison of findings from this study with those of previous studies |