Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 4;118(6):1401–1408. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2020.01.038

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Overlaps and gaps of fibrils resolved. All measurements were performed in air and at ambient conditions with the same type of AFM tip (Tip B; see Materials and Methods). (a) Stiffness as a function of strain (i) in the interval of 65 nm < D < 81 nm and (ii) in the interval of 65 nm < D < 72 nm is shown. (b) Reconstructed longitudinal force-versus-strain curves showing the expanded range of more than 20% are shown. (c) The difference in stiffness between the gap and the overlap as a function of strain for the strain-stiffening behavior is shown. (i) The linear fit L1 for data points in the interval 65 nm < D < 70 nm are as shown: slope = −0.07 nN/nm2, R2 = 0.33. The slope is significantly different from 0: p-value = 0.03. The linear fit L2 for data points in the interval 70 nm < D < 76 nm are as follows: slope = −0.006 nN/nm2, R2 = 0.008. The slope is not significantly different from 0: p-value = 0.82. (ii) The number of disordered sections is greater in the gap (G), which, therefore, strain stiffens faster (L1) than the overlap (O). At a certain strain, there is not such an excess of disordered sections in the gap anymore (L2), and the strain stiffening in gaps and overlaps is similar. Error bars represent the standard deviations of 10 measurements per data point. To see this figure in color, go online.