Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 23;21:122. doi: 10.1186/s12859-020-3449-2

Table 5.

Comparison between QuaDMutNetEx, HotNet2, DriverNet, and Dendrix

Method Genes in solution Coverage Excess coverage Dendrix score Connected components
TN: Triple negative breast cancer
HotNet2 128 0.6809 0.7969 -118 9
DriverNet 21 0.6383 0.4667 23 14
Dendrix 22 0.6170 0.1034 51 8
QuaDMutNetEx 13 0.6854 0.0983 55 3
GBM: Glioblastoma multiforme
HotNet2 37 0.7833 0.4149 10 11
DriverNet 17 0.9333 0.8661 -140 9
Dendrix 22 0.7166 0.023256 84 4
QuaDMutNetEx 6 0.8151 0.1855 79 1
HGS: high-grade serous ovarian cancer
HotNet2 58 0.8449 0.4307 83 4
DriverNet 72 0.9335 0.6373 -35 51
Dendrix 3 0.8037 0.0 254 3
QuaDMutNetEx 25 0.6170 0.1086 236 1
METABRIC: breast cancer
HotNet2 224 0.4424 0.7394 -1694 18
DriverNet 90 0.4683 0.7785 -1130 33
Dendrix 18 0.3836 0.1236 233 16
QuaDMutNetEx 25 0.3982 0.1753 216 4