Table 1.
Demographic information | Latino (n = 70) Mean ± SD | Caucasian (n = 255) Mean ± SD | p-value |
---|---|---|---|
Age at diagnosis | 63.4 ± 11.7 | 61.0 ±9.5 | †0.0666 |
Males | 51 | 189 | |
Females | 19 | 66 | |
BMI30.2 ± 6.6 | 28.0 ± 5.6 | †0.0060 | |
Cirrhosis etiology | |||
Hepatitis B | 2.9% | 4.9% | *0.742 |
Hepatitis C | 60.0% | 72.9% | *0.040 |
Alcohol abuse | 41.4% | 30.2% | *0.085 |
NAFLD | 8.6% | 4.7% | *0.237 |
Other | 4.3% | 5.9% | *0.773 |
Hypertension | 56% | 46% | *0.298 |
Diabetes | *0.069 | ||
No | 57% | 73% | |
Yes- No meds | 7% | 4% | |
Yes- meds | 35% | 23% | |
Females No | 42% | 73% | |
Females Yes | 58% | 27% | *0.044 |
No Meds: 5% Meds: 53% | No Meds: 2% Meds: 25% | ||
Males No | 73% | 63% | *0.480 |
Males Yes | 27% | 37% | |
No Meds: 5% Meds: 22% | No Meds: 8% Meds: 29% |
p-value:
Student’s T-test;
Fisher’s exact. Of note, it was possible patients had more than one etiology of liver disease and they were counted in both categories, making totals >100%.