Skip to main content
. 2009 Sep 11;143(3):537–544. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.07.026

Table 1.

MHC and neutral variation in natural populations. Npop – number of studied populations; Nind – number of studied individuals. The evidence for historical selection on MHC comes from a dN/dS ratio >1 in the Antigen Binding Sites (ABS); Recent selection is inferred from deviation of genotype frequencies from expected Hardy–Weinberg proportions (H–W), lack of correlation of allelic richness with that for neutral alleles (correlation), lack of significant isolation by distance (IBD), higher or lower population differentiation than for neutral alleles (FST outlier, population differentiation FST), departures of allele frequency spectra from those expected under neutrality (Ewens–Watterson (E–W) and Slatkin’s P and bottleneck tests for allele frequency data, Tajima’s D test for nucleotide sequence data).

Species (Taxon) Npop Nind Evidence for departure from neutrality
Populations examined
Historical Recent (type of evidence)
Teleosts
Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)a 7 666 YES (dN/dS) YES (E–W) NO (H–W, correlation) Comparison of land-locked and river populations
Brown trout (Salmo trutta)b 9 180 YES (dN/dS) NO (Tajima D, E–W, population differentiation (FST), correlation) Small isolated populations
Brown trout (Salmo trutta)c 7 492 Not estimated YES (FST outlier significant (diversifying selection) for MHC linked microsatellite locus in large populations, in small populations effect masked by immigration) Comparison of large populations and those that have declined in size
California coastal steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss)d 24 444 YES (dN/dS) NO (correlation, population differentiation FST), YES (FST outlier (diversifying selection) in one of three regions) Populations that have experienced recent declines in size
Gila trout (Oncorhynchus gilae gilae)e 10 142 YES (dN/dS) NO (FST outlier) Populations that have declined in size
Sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka)f 31 5400 YES (dN/dS) YES (E–W (16% of pops), Stalkin’s P (9% of pops), population differentiation FST) Thirty one river populations compared with one lake population



Amphibians
Alpine newt (Mesotriton alpestris)g 7 149 YES (dN/dS) NO (correlation, FST outlier) Groups of allopatric populations of postglacial origin
Crested newt (Triturus cristatus)h 7 100 YES (dN/dS) NO (correlation) Comparison between refugial populations and populations from the postglacial expansion area



Birds
Great snipe (Gallinago media)i 10 175 YES (dN/dS) YES (Tajima’s D, high structure between regions, not explained by neutral marker diversity, IBD) Scandinavian mountain vs. East European population
Lesser kestrel (Falco naumanni)j 7 121 YES (dN/dS) YES (Tajima’s D) NO (correlation, IBD pattern) Free ranging but fragmented wild populations
South island robin (Petroica australis australis)k 3 26 YES (dN/dS) NO (correlation) Small, bottlenecked population



Mammals
Spotted suslik (Spermophilus suslicus)l 10 195 YES (dN/dS) NO (correlation, FST outlier) Small, bottlenecked populations
Water vole (Arvicola terrestris)m 7 591 YES (dN/dS) NO (global FST outlier) YES (bottleneck, higher diversity in MHC at the phase of low population density, stronger selection at DQA1 locus, at high density phase effect masked by migration) Demographically fluctuating populations, comparison of low and high density phase
Water vole (Arvicola terrestris)n 3 1303 YES (dN/dS) YES (H–W: excess of heterozygotes in MHC but not in microsatellites; GST among metapopulations higher for MHC than for microsatellites), NO (between-year correlation of MHC and microsatellite differentiation at the metapopulation level) Metapopulations sampled over multiple years