Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 24.
Published in final edited form as: J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2018 Nov 12;81(22):1186–1198. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2018.1544523

Table 2.

Gender-specific effects of polymorphisms of the TLR genes on lung function in the workers in multivariate analysis*.

Gene Lung function Male workers Female workers
Polymorphism mean (SE) Wild-type mean (SE) Difference (SE) Polymorphism mean (SE) Wild-type mean (SE) Difference (SE)
TLR1
 RS5743551 FEV1, L 3.84 (0.06) 3.86 (0.06) −0.03 (0.07)d 3.22 (0.07) 3.22 (0.07) −0.01 (0.07)d
FVC, L 4.92 (0.07) 4.98 (0.09) −0.06 (0.09)d 4.17 (0.09) 4.24 (0.08) −0.07 (0.09)d
FEV1/FVC, % 78.35 (1.55) 77.67 (0.66) 0.68 (1.55)r 76.82 (0.99) 75.76 (0.94) 1.06(0.98)d
FEF25%–75%, L 3.70 (0.27) 3.62 (0.11) 0.09 (0.27)r 2.84 (0.28) 2.94 (0.13) −0.10 (0.29)r
TLR2
 RS4696480 FEV1, L 3.93 (0.08) 3.81 (0.05) 0.12 (0.09)r 3.39 (0.08) 3.14 (0.06) 0.25 (0.08)r
FVC, L 5.01 (0.09) 4.92 (0.06) 0.08 (0.10)r 4.38 (0.09) 4.11 (0.08) 0.27 (0.09)r
FEV1/FVC, % 78.41 (1.06) 77.25 (0.72) 1.16 (1.19)r 76.82 (1.12) 75.92 (0.91) 0.90 (1.13)r
FEF25%–75%, L 3.88 (0.18) 3.48 (0.12) 0.40 (0.21)r 3.16 (0.16) 2.82 (0.13) 0.34 (0.16)r
TLR3
 RS3775291 FEV1, L 4.02 (0.09) 3.80 (0.05) 0.21 (0.10)r 3.15 (0.13) 3.26 (0.06) −0.11 (0.12)r
FVC, L 5.16 (0.12) 4.89 (0.06) 0.27 (0.12)r 4.20 (0.15) 4.23 (0.08) −0.04 (0.15)r
FEV1/FVC, % 77.31 (0.75) 78.20 (0.87) −0.89 (0.99)d 74.91 (1.75) 76.64 (0.87) −1.73 (1.71)r
FEF25%–75%, L 3.84 (0.22) 3.56 (0.12) 0.28 (0.24)r 2.66 (0.25) 3.02 (0.13) −0.36 (0.25)r
TLR4
 RS4986790 FEV1, L 3.91 (0.11) 3.87 (0.05) 0.04 (0.12)d 3.17 (0.11) 3.29 (0.07) −0.12 (0.12)d
FVC, L 5.13 (0.14) 4.97 (0.06) 0.16 (0.14)d 4.05 (0.12) 4.23 (0.08) −0.18 (0.13)d
FEV1/FVC, % 76.31 (1.44) 77.82 (0.66) −1.50 (1.45)d 77.65 (1.39) 77.59 (0.92) 0.06 (1.51)d
FEF25%–75%, L 3.58 (0.25) 3.65 (0.11) −0.06 (0.25)d 3.01 (0.22) 3.19 (0.14) −0.18 (0.23)d
TLR6
 RS5743810 FEV1, L 4.03 (0.11) 3.82 (0.05) 0.21 (0.11)r 3.23 (0.07) 3.21 (0.08) 0.02 (0.07)d
FVC, L 5.02 (0.14) 4.93 (0.06) 0.09 (0.14)r 4.23 (0.08) 4.18 (0.09) 0.05 (0.09)d
FEV1/FVC, % 80.40 (1.49) 77.34 (0.66) 3.06 (1.50)r 77.34 (1.37) 76.01 (0.86) 1.33 (1.29)r
FEF25%–75%, L 4.14 (0.26) 3.55 (0.11) 0.59 (0.26)r 3.07 (0.20) 2.91 (0.13) 0.16 (0.19)r
TLR9
 RS187084 FEV1, L 3.74 (0.09) 3.88 (0.05) −0.14 (0.09)r 3.25 (0.09) 3.21 (0.07) 0.03 (0.09)r
FVC, L 4.68 (0.10) 5.02 (0.06) −0.34 (0.11)r 4.30 (0.11) 4.17 (0.08) 0.13 (0.10)r
FEV1/FVC, % 79.59 (1.16) 77.09 (0.69) 2.51 (1.24)r 75.01 (1.20) 76.67 (0.89) −1.66 (1.19)r
FEF25%–75%, L 3.79 (0.20) 3.56 (0.12) 0.24 (0.22)r 2.98 (0.13) 2.82 (0.17) 0.16 (0.16)d
TLR10
 RS4129009 FEV1, L 3.94 (0.13) 3.84 (0.05) 0.11 (0.13)r 3.18 (0.17) 3.23 (0.06) −0.04 (0.17)r
FVC, L 5.04 (0.16) 4.94 (0.06) 0.10 (0.16)r 4.13 (0.20) 4.21 (0.08) −0.08 (0.20)r
FEV1/FVC, % 77.83 (0.83) 77.51 (0.79) 0.32 (0.98)d 76.55 (1.17) 76.11 (0.89) 0.45 (1.09)d
FEF25%–75%, L 3.57 (0.14) 3.65 (0.14) −0.09 (0.17)d 2.76 (0.34) 2.95 (0.13) −0.19 (0.34)r
*:

Only those SNPs which follow HWE and are common variances (MAF>5.0%) were selected into the multivariate models adjusting for age, height, weight, and smoking habit.

†:

Significant at α = 0.05 level.

‡:

Significant after adjusting for multiple comparison at α = 0.007 (0.05/7).

d:

(dominant inheritance has the best-fitted model).

r:

(recessive inheritance has the best-fitted model).