Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 29;12(5):4082–4092. doi: 10.18632/aging.102725

Table 2. Replication of the GWAS identified OSAS variants in Chinese population.

OSAS cases Controls OR (95% CIs) * P value
rs10097555
AA 621 691 1.00 (Reference)
AG 267 355 0.84 (0.69-1.01) 0.069
GG 12 32 0.42 (0.22-0.8) 0.009
G vs A 0.80 (0.71-0.90) 0.001
rs11074782
CC 606 680 1.00 (Reference)
TC 267 343 0.87 (0.72-1.06) 0.171
TT 27 55 0.55 (0.35-0.88) 0.012
T vs C 0.82 (0.73-0.92) 0.001
rs10777373
CC 472 513 1.00 (Reference)
TC 361 446 0.88 (0.73-1.06) 0.179
TT 67 119 0.61 (0.44-0.84) 0.003
T vs C 0.82 (0.73-0.94) 0.003
rs11588454
TT 479 638 1.00 (Reference)
TC 360 388 1.24 (1.03-1.49) 0.026
CC 61 52 1.56 (1.06-2.30) 0.023
C vs T 1.25 (1.11-1.40) 0.002
rs11897825
AA 286 409 1.00 (Reference)
AG 466 518 1.29 (1.06-1.57) 0.012
GG 148 151 1.40 (1.07-1.84) 0.015
G vs A 1.20 (1.09-1.32) 0.001

* Adjusted for age, smoking status, family history of cancer and BMI.