Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ophthalmology. 2020 Jan 10;127(4):477–483. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.10.022

Table 2.

Estimated mean deviation (MD) from a linear mixed regression model*, by adherence and follow-up

0 Missed
(n=142)
≤⅓ Missed
(n=112)
⅓-⅔ Missed
(n=31)
≥⅔ Missed
(n=21)
Years From Enrollment Estimate
(CI)
Estimate
(CI)
Estimate
(CI)
Estimate
(CI)
2 −5.04 −5.28 −5.40 −5.52
(−5.34, −4.75) (−5.58, −4.99) (−5.73, −5.07) (−5.90, −5.14)
4 −5.20 −5.62 −5.84 −6.05
(−5.52, −4.88) (−5.97, −5.28) (−6.28, −5.40) (−6.61, −5.49)
6 −5.35 −5.97 −6.28 −6.58
(−5.73, −4.98) (−6.40, −5.54) (−6.87, −5.69) (−7.36, −5.81)
8 −5.51 −6.31 −6.71 −7.12
(−5.96, −5.05) (−6.85, −5.78) (−7.47, −5.96) (−8.12, −6.11)
MD Loss −0.62 −1.42 −1.82 −2.23
0 vs 8 (−1.06, −0.17) (−1.98, −0.86) (−2.61, −1.04) (−3.26, −1.19)
P-value 0.0065 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
*

For different levels of adherence, the mean deviation (MD) over time from enrollment was estimated using a linear mixed regression model. For this display, the covariates baseline MD and age were set to their mean values, and cataract extraction was set to ‘no’; 95% confidence intervals (CI) are provided.