Table 1.
Study | N | States | Scenarios | Task | Targets | Runs | Trials/Run | Trial length |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Study 1A | 20 | 60 | Text | Choice | Generic other | 16 | 60 | 4.75 s |
Study 1B | 35 | 25 | Text | Choice | Self, close, far | 12 | 75 | 4.5 s |
Study 1C | 28 | 15 | Text | Rating | Generic other | 4 | 225 | 2.5 s |
Study 1D | 30 | 30 | Images | Choice | Self, far | 12 | 60 | 4.2 s |
Note: Scenarios presented as text consisted of short (∼3–5 word) statements such as “seeing the pyramids” or “watching a meteor shower” that corresponded to a given mental state (e.g., awe); Images consisted of photos and drawings that conveyed similar content. The choice task consisted of selecting which of two scenarios would elicit more of a given state in a target person. The rating task consisted of rating the extent to which one such scenario would elicit a given state in a target person on a Likert-type scale. All trials were interspersed with fixation periods, including random jitter equal to 1/4th the total length of experiment, except in Study 3, which followed a continuous carryover design.