Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 12;11(4):267–285. doi: 10.1007/s13238-020-00692-z

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Secondary structure and microscopic morphology of the silk nanofiber hydrogels with mechanical gradient cues. (A) XRD and (B) FTIR spectra of different areas of the hydrogels with various mechanical properties; (C) AFM images of different area of the hydrogels with various mechanical cues. Higher amount of BSNF appeared at the sites with stiffer mechanical properties; (D) SEM images of different area of the hydrogels with various mechanical cues. The images exhibited better anisotropic morphologies at sites with stiffer mechanical properties. White arrows indicated the aligned structures