Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 24;10:5322. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61467-4

Table 2.

Geometrical factors for the six patients analyzed (with and without MAD). LP: pharyngeal length, τ the hypothetical pharyngeal straight length, ε: tortuosity index, β:asymmetry factor, Amin: Minimum area, A inlet: Inlet Area, A outlet: Outlet Area and γ.

Volume (mm3) Ainlet (mm) AOutlet (mm) Amin (mm) τ (mm) LP (mm) Tortuosity (ε) % Stenosis β (mm) γ
P1 11774.00 257.57 389.21 38.46 71.91 73.69 1.02 0.85 4.98 1.01
P1_MAD 21498.00 327.87 623.29 81.84 77.10 80.18 1.04 0.75 5.02
P2 12043.00 193.90 380.91 71.39 68.47 73.76 1.08 0.63 3.42 0.96
P2_MAD 14397.00 285.73 199.25 156.87 67.14 69.66 1.04 0.45 2.65
P3 13413.00 236.43 448.50 95.83 70.44 74.45 1.06 0.59 1.05 1.01
P3_MAD 19868.00 303.63 422.93 157.19 76.72 82.07 1.07 0.48 0.75
P4 11937.60 203.48 430.28 100.83 66.76 71.52 1.07 0.45 0.36 0.98
P4_MAD 12046.00 223.85 412.65 101.29 63.50 66.92 1.05 0.55 0.40
P5 15118.00 192.75 260.51 138.44 73.16 75.12 1.03 0.28 2.31 1.01
P5_MAD 30531.00 310.21 538.31 239.75 77.74 80.88 1.04 0.23 2.40
P6 17883.00 227.81 350.78 165.82 71.80 72.75 1.01 0.27 0.93 1.00
P6_MAD 23698.00 276.00 405.37 253.81 80.27 81.28 1.01 0.08 1.60