Table 7.
Functional outcomes of ROP treatment
| Sl no. | Author | Country | Year of publication | Type of study | Intervention | Eyes | ROP stage | Mean SE (Dioptres) | Myopia (%) | High myopia (%) | Follow-up (years) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Katoch et al. [30] | India | 2011 | Retrospective | Laser | 69 | Type 1 | +0.75 | 26.1 | 1.4 | 1 |
| 2 | Axer-Siegel et al. [81] | Israel | 2008 | Retrospective | Laser | 134 | Type 1 or threshold | 1.5 | 55.2 | 23.9 | 2.9 |
| 3 | Agarkar et al. [82] | India | 2017 | Retrospective | Laser + LSV | 14 | Stage 4A, 4B | −7.4 | NA | NA | 2 |
| Laser | 14 | Type 1 | −6.4 | NA | NA | ||||||
| 4 | Chen et al. [83] | Taiwan | 2014 | Retrospective | IVB | 40 | 5-stage 2, 52-stage 3 | −0.98 | 47.5 | 10 | 2 |
| IVB + Laser | 17 | −2.4 | 82.4 | 29.4 | |||||||
| IVB + LSV | 7 | Stage 4A | −14.4 | 100 | 100 | ||||||
| 5 | Yang et al. [84] | Taiwan | 2010 | Retrospective | Laser | 60 | Threshold | −3.87 | 60.3 | 16.7 | 7.8 |
| 6 | Shah PK et al. [85] | India | 2014 | Retrospective | Laser | 48 | APROP | −6.14 | 4.1 | NA | 6.9 |
SE spherical equivalent, High myopia More than 5D of myopia, LSV lens sparing vitrectomy, IVB intravitreal Bevacizumab, NA not available, Cryo cryotherapy