Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 24;10:5288. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62094-9

Table 2.

Results of the final model of the effect of canine Sensory Processing Sensitivity (cSPS-score), owner Sensory Processing Sensitivity (SPS-score) and aversive communication style (reported “negative” and “positive punishment”) on the likelihood of behaviour problems.

Predictor Odds ratio (95% CI) Z P value
cSPS-score 3.86 (3.48–4.28) 6.62 <0.0001
SPS-score 1.47 (1.24–1.76) 2.22 0.0262
cSPS-score x SPS-score 0.89 (0.86–0.93) −2.56 0.0104
Reported “positive punishment” 1.27 (1.17–1.38) 2.78 0.0055
Reported “negative punishment” 0.55 (0.36–0.83) −1.45 0.1462
cSPS-score x reported “negative punishment” 1.24 (1.13–1.37) 2.21 0.0269
Dog sex: male neutered compared to male intact† 1.33 (1.19–1.49) 2.46 0.0141
Previous owner: No previous owner compared to previous owner‡ 0.74 (0.68–0.81) −3.33 0.0009

Female intact and neutered were not significantly different to male intact. Previous owner = “don’t know” was not significantly different from no previous owner.