Table 2.
Results of the final model of the effect of canine Sensory Processing Sensitivity (cSPS-score), owner Sensory Processing Sensitivity (SPS-score) and aversive communication style (reported “negative” and “positive punishment”) on the likelihood of behaviour problems.
| Predictor | Odds ratio (95% CI) | Z | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| cSPS-score | 3.86 (3.48–4.28) | 6.62 | <0.0001 |
| SPS-score | 1.47 (1.24–1.76) | 2.22 | 0.0262 |
| cSPS-score x SPS-score | 0.89 (0.86–0.93) | −2.56 | 0.0104 |
| Reported “positive punishment” | 1.27 (1.17–1.38) | 2.78 | 0.0055 |
| Reported “negative punishment” | 0.55 (0.36–0.83) | −1.45 | 0.1462 |
| cSPS-score x reported “negative punishment” | 1.24 (1.13–1.37) | 2.21 | 0.0269 |
| Dog sex: male neutered compared to male intact† | 1.33 (1.19–1.49) | 2.46 | 0.0141 |
| Previous owner: No previous owner compared to previous owner‡ | 0.74 (0.68–0.81) | −3.33 | 0.0009 |
†Female intact and neutered were not significantly different to male intact. ‡Previous owner = “don’t know” was not significantly different from no previous owner.