Table 3.
Advantages and Limitations of Technique
| Advantages |
| The surgeon can choose the orientation of the new tunnels without restrictions. |
| The substrate for osseointegration of the reconstruction is optimal. |
| The use of an Achilles graft makes it possible to replace the absent autologous graft. |
| The use of an Achilles graft allows reconstruction of both the ACL and ALL. |
| Donor-area morbidity is reduced. |
| The bone block of the Achilles graft allows a natural fixation without using implants. |
| Rotational stability is increased thanks to lateral ligament reinforcement. |
| The iliotibial band is not weakened by other anterolateral techniques. |
| The possibility of convergence of the ACL and anterolateral tunnels is avoided. |
| A longitudinal incision in the lateral aspect of the knee is not necessary for lateral reinforcement. |
| The ischemia time is shorter if the Achilles graft is prepared before tourniquet application. |
| Limitations |
| Two surgical procedures, which multiplies associated risks |
| Longer modification time of normal activity, during integration of tunnel filling |
| More time with unstable knee, which increases risks of meniscal and/or chondral damage |
| Higher rerupture risk (especially in young patients) |
| More expensive than using autograft |
| Dependence on tissue bank availability |
| Higher risk of infection or disease transmission because of allograft use |
| Slower biological incorporation of graft |
| Fast rehabilitation not advisable |
ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; ALL, anterolateral ligament.