Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 10;8(3):e16240. doi: 10.2196/16240

Table 7.

Marijuana Stroop task: multilevel model of marijuana high in relation to number of correct responses.

Effects Stroop number of correct responses (n=60)

Estimate SE 95% CI P value
Fixed effects

Person level (level 2)


Intercept 29.03 0.53 N/Aa .001b


Session −0.00 0 N/A .001b


Session2 (quadratic) N/A N/A N/A N/A


Subjective high (PMc) 0.37 0.13 N/A .003b


Distraction (PM) −0.82 0.41 N/A .046d


Subjective high (PM) × distraction (PM) −0.22 0.1 N/A .02d


Gender (0=male, 1=female) 0.11 0.07 N/A .14


Age (0=age 20) −0.03 0.02 N/A .11


Full-scale IQ (0=IQ score of 110) 0.02 0.01 N/A .02d

Session level (level 1)


Subjective high (CCe) −0.01 0.01 N/A .45

Distraction (CC) −0.10 0.03 N/A .001b

Subjective high (CC) × distraction (CC) −0.01 0.01 N/A .23
Random effects

Level 1 residual variance 0.51 0.01 0.49 to 0.54 N/A

Intercept 0.06 0.01 0.04 to 0.09 N/A

aNot applicable.

bP<.01.

cPM: person mean scores, reflecting individual differences in subjective marijuana high or distraction across all sessions.

dP<.05.

eCC: constant-centered scores (centered at 0), reflecting session-to-session variation in scores or session-specific scores.