Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 7;4(2):171–181. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50240

Table 2.

Modified CONSORT checklist and adherence in the 88 trials

Item Description No description Inadequate description Adequate description
1 Collected data on harms and benefits stated in title and abstract 0 (0) 34 (39) 54 (61)
2 Collected data on harms and benefits stated in the introduction 0 (0) 62 (71) 26 (30)
3 Explicit definition of eligibility criteria for participants 0 (0) 1 (1) 87 (99)
4 Description of settings/locations where data were collected 1 (1) 35 (40) 52 (59)
5 Details of intervention intended for each group and how/when they were administered 3 (3) 6 (7) 79 (90)
6 Specific objectives and hypotheses 0 (0) 3 (3) 85 (97)
7 Clearly defined primary and secondary outcome measures, and (when applicable) any methods used to enhance quality of measurements 0 (0) 20 (23) 68 (77)
8 List addressed adverse events with definitions for each 13 (15) 34 (39) 41 (47)
9 Clarify how harms‐related data were collected 17 (19) 21 (24) 50 (57)
10 How sample size was determined and (when applicable) explanation of any interim analyses and stopping rules 12 (14) 0 (0) 76 (86)
11 Method used to generate the random allocation sequence, including details of any restriction 20 (23) 4 (5) 64 (73)
12 Method used to implement the random allocation sequence, clarifying whether sequence was concealed until interventions were assigned 21 (24) 3 (3) 64 (73)
13 Who generated the allocation sequence, who enrolled participants, who assigned participants to their groups 53 (60) 4 (5) 31 (35)
14 Details of blinding of subjects 49 (56) 0 (0) 39 (44)
15 Details of blinding of treatment providers 55 (63) 0 (0) 33 (38)
16 Details of blinding of assessors 43 (49) 1 (1) 44 (50)
17 Details of blinding of data analysts 64 (73) 0 (0) 24 (27)
18 How the success of masking was assessed 66 (75) 0 (0) 22 (25)
19 Statistical methods used to compare groups for primary outcome(s); methods for additional analyses 0 (0) 7 (8) 81 (92)
20 Describe plans for presenting and analysing information on harms 23 (26) 11 (13) 54 (61)
21 Flow chart describing patient numbers at different stages 22 (25) 1 (1) 65 (74)
22 Flow of participants described in text; describe protocol deviations from study as planned together with reasons 0 (0) 24 (27) 64 (73)
23 Dates defining the periods of recruitment and follow‐up 5 (6) 2 (2) 81 (92)
24 Describe withdrawals due to harms and their experiences with allocated treatment 35 (40) 12 (14) 41 (47)
25 Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of each group 1 (1) 6 (7) 81 (92)
26 Number of participants in each group included in each analysis; use of intention‐to‐treat principle. State results in absolute numbers when feasible 27 (31) 1 (1) 60 (68)
27 Provide the denominators for analyses on harms 11 (13) 20 (23) 57 (65)
28 Complete reporting of results and estimated effect size and its precision 0 (0) 15 (17) 73 (83)
29 Multiple testing and corrections, indicating those prespecified and those exploratory 16 (18) 0 (0) 72 (82)
30 All important adverse events or side‐effects in each intervention group/patient 10 (11) 21 (24) 57 (65)
31 Present the absolute risk per arm and per adverse event type, grade, and seriousness, and present appropriate metrics for recurrent events, continuous variables and scale variables 11 (13) 33 (38) 44 (50)
32 Describe any subgroup analyses and exploratory analyses for harms 69 (78) 2 (2) 17 (19)
33 Balanced discussion of own study results 0 (0) 34 (39) 54 (61)
34 Balanced discussion of generalizability of study results 78 (89) 0 (0) 10 (11)
35 Balanced discussion in comparison with overall evidence 0 (0) 32 (36) 56 (64)

Values in parentheses are percentages.