Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 26;4(2):216–224. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50248

Table 4.

Exploratory subgroup analysis: adjusted primary and secondary outcomes according to administration of tranexamic acid versus placebo in patients who had simple mastectomy/sentinel node biopsy at centre A

TXA (n = 52) versus placebo (n = 56) P
Primary outcome
Drain production in first 24 h*, −39 (−69, −14) 0·001
Secondary outcomes
Early haematoma TXA 0 versus placebo 3# 0·244
Total drain production*, −46 (−81, −18) 0·001
Days with drain* −23 (−83, −10) 0·001
Drain removed at 24 h§ 6·60 (2·07, 21·22) 0·001
Drain volume in 24 h before removal* −9 (−30, 9) 0·309
Late haematoma, postoperative infection or wound rupture TXA 5 versus placebo 6# 1·000
Seroma
Aspiration required§ 1·11 (0·44, 2·79) 0·821
≥ 5 aspirations§ 0·47 (0·15, 1·50) 0·203
Cumulative seroma ≥ 500 ml§ 1·05 (0·38, 2·90) 0·930
Chronic seroma§ 0·18 (0·04, 0·89) 0·035

Values in parentheses are 95 per cent confidence intervals.

*

Ratio between logarithmic mean as percentage difference; univariable general linear model adjusted for drug and wound surface area;

additionally adjusted for surgeon seniority.

Number of patients with early haematoma calculated from all patients; patients with early haematoma excluded from other secondary postoperative outcome registrations.

§

Odds ratio: logistic regression model adjusted for wound surface area.

Patients with early or late haematoma, infection or wound rupture excluded from seroma registrations. TXA, tranexamic acid.

#

Fisher's exact test owing to number of patients being too low for logistic regression analysis.