Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 23;14:21–29. doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2020.02.004

Table 5.

Comparison of volumes and dosimetry based on a synthetic CT created from CT1 with CT2 at fraction 16.

Planning CT1
#16 synthetic CT1
CT2 at fraction 16
#16 synthetic CT2
Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD
Volume (cc) Ipsilateral
Parotid Gland
28.8 (11.5) 26.1 (11.2) 26.1 (11.3) 26.3 (11.3)
Contralateral
Parotid Gland
28.6 (10.6) 26.1 (9.9) 25.9 (10.0) 26.2 (10.0)
Mean dose (cGy) PTV_HR 218.2 (1.3) 218.1 (1.8) 218.4 (2.2) 218.1 (2.3)
Ipsilateral 137.2 (25.2) 136.8 (27.8) 137.2 (27.6) 136.7 (27.0)
contralateral 86.9 (31.2) 89.7 (31.1) 87.0 (29.9) 86.8 (29.2)
Maximum dose (cGy) PRV_Brainstem 146.2 (12.9) 146.9 (21.3) 143.0 (17.0) 145.5 (23.7)
PRV_Spinal Cord 139.5 (6.5) 142.5 (15.0) 138.3 (9.3) 140.9 (15.5)
D95% PTV_HR 96.6 (1.8) 95.1 (2.6) 94.9 (4.5) 93.6 (6.9)
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
D95%<95% PTV_HR 1 (5) 6 (30) 6 (30) 7 (35)