Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 29;136(7):877–882. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0288

TABLE 2.

FILTERING EFFICIENCIES OF THE THREE SURGICAL MASKS.

MASK TYPE PERCENTAGES OF PARTICLES REMOVED (FILTERING EFFICIENCY) AT THE TWO AIRFLOW RATES STUDIED
Airflow Rate
0.5 m3/hour* 9 m3/hour
1818 Mask 85 86

1942 Mask 90 92

1862 Respirators§ 94 96
*

m3/hour: Cubic meters per hour.

1818 Tie-On Surgical Mask (3M ESPE SpA, Milan, Italy).

1942 FB Fluid Resistant Molded Surgical Mask (marketed internationally as the Aseptex Fluid Resistant Molded Surgical Mask 1800) (3M ESPE SpA, Milan, Italy).

§

1862 Health Care Particulate Respirator and Surgical Mask (3M ESPE SpA, Milan, Italy).