Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 13;4(6):983–992. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019001126

Table 4.

Multivariate Cox models for individual late effects in AYA patients with AML after ablative HCT

Late effect/variable n HR 95% CI P
SN
 Conditioning regimen .696
  Non-TBI MAC 435 1
  TBI MAC 383 0.82 0.31-2.20
 Disease status at HCT .049
  CR1 571 1
  CR2+ 247 2.70 1.00-7.27
 cGVHD
  No 368 1
  Yes 450 1.28 0.46-3.55 .637
AVN
 Conditioning regimen .178
  Non-TBI MAC 422 1
  TBI MAC 367 1.48 0.84-2.64
 cGVHD .006
  No 354 1
  Yes 435 2.49 1.29-4.76
Cataracts
 Conditioning regimen
  Non-TBI MAC 432 1
  TBI MAC 379 4.98 2.42-10.24 <.0001
  TBI MAC 550-1200 cGy 23 2.08 0.26-16.45 .486
  TBI MAC ≥1200 cGy 356 5.16 2.51-10.63 <.0001
 Disease status at HCT .049
  CR1 567 1
  CR2+ 244 1.74 1.00-3.03
 cGVHD .0006
  No 363 1
  Yes 448 3.22 1.65-6.29
Diabetes mellitus
 Conditioning regimen .202
  Non-TBI MAC 340 1
  TBI MAC 314 1.82 0.72-4.58
 cGVHD .030
  No 300 1
  Yes 354 3.36 1.12-10.04
Gonadal dysfunction
 Conditioning regimen .980
  Non-TBI MAC 419 1
  TBI MAC 365 0.99 0.60-1.64
 Sex of recipient .019
  Male 437 1
  Female 347 1.83 1.10-3.04
 Disease status before HCT .006
  CR1 544 1
  CR2+ 240 2.02 1.22-3.35
Hypothyroidism
 Conditioning regimen .367
  Non-TBI MAC 426 1
  TBI MAC 372 1.55 0.60-4.00