Table 2.
Functional PET parameters | ROC analysis for PFS | ROC analysis for OS | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cutoff point | Sensitivity, % | Specificity, % | AUC | P | Cutoff point | Sensitivity, % | Specificity, % | AUC | P | ||
Testing set | SUVmax | 20 | 60 | 55 | 0.556 | .342 | 24.2 | 74 | 40 | 0.550 | .433 |
MTV, mL | 931 | 57 | 75 | 0.629 | .029 | 1149 | 52 | 81 | 0.670 | .011 | |
TLG | 3960 | 63 | 62 | 0.620 | .034 | 6991 | 57 | 73 | 0.661 | .012 | |
MH (AUC-CSH) | 0.43 | 53 | 66 | 0.545 | .474 | 0.43 | 52 | 69 | 0.555 | .431 | |
Validation set | SUVmax | 31 | 27 | 86 | 0.507 | .917 | 31 | 32 | 86 | 0.582 | .267 |
MTV, mL | 336 | 73 | 54 | 0.629 | .029 | 336 | 79 | 54 | 0.637 | .070 | |
TLG | 3186 | 55 | 66 | 0.574 | .318 | 3574 | 63 | 70 | 0.634 | .079 | |
MH (AUC-CSH) | 0.47 | 53 | 66 | 0.527 | .730 | 0.46 | 42 | 85 | 0.648 | .046 |
Bold P values indicate statistically significant results (P < .05).