Skip to main content
. 2019 May 10;102(7):5784–5810. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15603

Table 6.

Manuscripts comparing mortality rates in calves or general calf health, with and without a period of extended maternal contact1

Study Country Breed2 Contact type Contact duration Contact duration (controls) Type of colostrum (control groups) Amount of colostrum (control groups) Calf age under study n (calves) No. of herds (no. of groups) Conclusion
Alvarez et al., 1980 Mexico HF, Brown Swiss, × Zebu Restricted suckling Calf present at milking, then restricted suckling 0 d (immediate separation “at birth”) Not specified, then milk by bucket Not specified 0–24 mo 464 1 (2) Mortality was 6% in restricted suckling group and 56% in artificially reared animals +3
Kovalcik et al., 1980 Not specified Blackspotted Free Contact 48-h observation ≤1 h Not specified Not specified 48 h 6 1 (2) Dam-reared calves urinated and defecated earlier and more frequently +3
Metz and Metz, 1986 Poland HF Free contact 24-h observation 0 d (immediate separation) Not specified 2 L 0–1 d 67 1 (2) Dam-reared calves urinated and defecated earlier, beneficial for first colostrum intake +
Waltner- Toews et al., 1986 Canada HF (Multi-herd study based upon questionnaires, farm visits, and record keeping) 0–28 d 1,800 35 Calves that suckled naturally had lower odds of treatment for disease versus bucket-fed calves +
Quigley et al., 1995 Not specified Jersey Free contact 3 d 0 d (immediate separation) Fresh colostrum from dam 1 L after birth, 1 L at 12 h 0–32 d 101 1 (2 relevant) Mortality rates lower for suckling group +3
Boonbrahm et al., 2004a Thailand HF4 Restricted suckling 3 d full, 15 min (2×/d) for 80 d (postmilking) 3 d full Dam's colostrum N/A5 4–84 d 40 1 (2) Increased mortality in separated calves vs. those with restricted suckling opportunity +3
Hartman et al., 1974 United States HF (Multi-herd study with questionnaires on calf housing provided to producers) N/A 0–90 d Not specified 247 Housing calves separately from cows had no effect on mortality rates =3
Curtis et al., 1988 United States HF (Multi-herd study with standardized check-off forms provided to producers regarding health and mortality in addition to questions pertaining to calf management) N/A 0–90 d 1,171 26 Mortality not significantly different among calves receiving colostrum by suckling vs. other methods =
Perez et al., 1990 The Netherlands HF, Dutch Friesian, Meuse-Rhine-Issel and cross breeds (Multi-herd study comparing mortality in dairy calves under different managerial systems) Varied 0–28 d 1,037 63 Mortality not significantly different in calves that received colostrum by suckling versus by hand =
Little et al., 1991 Ethiopia Friesian × Boran Restricted suckling 24 h free contact, then restricted suckling 2×/d before milking 24 h All of the dam's colostrum 0–94 d 13 1 (2) No mortalities occurred, thus no difference between bucket reared and restricted suckling group =3
Wells et al., 1996 United States HF4 Free contact 24 h 12 h Varied Varied 0–21 d 9,484 906 Increased mortality rate in calves separated at 24 vs. 12 h
Jenny et al., 1981 United States Varied (Multi-herd study with survey forms on management practices and mortality data mailed to producers) N/A 0–6 mo Not specified 140 Lower mortality in herds where calves were separated early 3
Gulliksen et al., 2009b Norway Norwegian Red4 (Multi-herd study with questionnaires on calf housing provided to producers) Varied 0–7 d 5,382 125 Suckling calves tended to have increased risk of mortality compared with hand-fed calves 6
1

Listed for each study are country, breed of cattle, type of cow-calf contact allowed, duration of this contact, how colostrum was fed to calves in the control condition (i.e., in which calves were not allowed to suckle), the amount of colostrum provided in this condition, the age range of calves under study, the total number of calves followed, the number of herds (and groups within a herd), and the authors' conclusion and direction of effect (with + signifying a beneficial effect of suckling or cow-calf contact, − signifying a negative effect, and = representing no difference. Studies are ordered chronologically within effect direction).

2

HF signifies that breed was reported as Holstein, Friesian, or Holstein-Friesian.

3

No statistical test performed.

4

Predominantly.

5

N/A = not applicable.

6

No significant difference, P = 0.07.