Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 27;92(10):5057–5066. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2080

Table 3.

Hazard ratio (HR; with 95% confidence interval [CI]) estimates for diarrhea or not (0/1) using the Cox regression model accounting for cluster effects at the herd-level in 5,101 calves in 125 Norwegian dairy herds1

Fixed effect Class Herds, N Calves, n Estimate (β) SE HR (95% CI) P-value
Recorded >50% of all dehornings Yes 33 1,228 2.54 0.60 12.7 (3.8–42.0) <0.001
No 92 3,873 1.0
Stall type Free-stall 54 2,195 1.30 0.60 3.7 (1.1–12.2) <0.05
Tie-stall 71 2,906 1.0
Purchase of calves during the last year Yes 25 1,187 1.42 0.56 4.1 (1.4–12.4) <0.05
No 95 3,712 1.0
No information 5 202 NS
Slatted concrete floor in group pen Yes 69 2,739 2.17 0.68 8.9 (2.3–33.1) <0.05
No 49 2,157 1.0
No information 7 205 NS
Born during winter Yes 1,189 0.42 0.15 1.5 (1.1–2.0) <0.001
No 3,912 1.0
Born from purchased dam Yes 4,362 −0.68 0.37 0.5 (0.2–1.1) 0.07
No 739 1.0
θ (1 - Kendall's τ) Herds 125 0.60 0.07 <0.001
1

The cluster effect within herd is assessed by the frailty effect (Kendall's τ).