Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 2;97(8):5110–5119. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7695

Table 4.

Data on standard calf feeding on the 100 visited farms

Variable Category Number of farms1
P-value
Case Control
Milk feeding Whole milk 44 40
Milk replacer 1 5 0.89
Both 5 5 0.20
Feeding waste milk to calves No 8 9
Only to male calves 24 24 0.84
To all calves (males and females) 17 17 1.00
No answer 1 0
Quantity of milk fed Ad libitum 2 2
Restricted (10 to 12% of calf BW) 48 48
Type of feeding Bucket with artificial teat 49 46
Bucket without artificial teat 0 2 0.54
Automated milk feeder 1 2 0.99
Cleaning of bucket after each feeding No 2 1
Yes 48 49 0.62
Cleaning of bucket With cleaning agents 9 15
Only water 37 35 0.35
Buckets shared by calves No 11 12
Yes 39 38
Weaning age (wk) Median2 10.0 9.0 0.63
IR3 (25 to 75%) 8.0 to 12.0 8.0 to 12.0
Access to hay from wk 2 of life No 9 9
Yes 41 38 0.75
Variable 0 3 0.69
Access to concentrates from first 3 wk of life No 12 13
Yes 33 35 0.28
Variable 5 2 0.26
Access to water preweaning No 7 4
Free access 19 22 0.42
Restricted access 24 24 0.73
1

Case farms are farms with the presence of diarrhea; control farms are farms without calf diarrhea.

2

Variable was not categorized; continuous variable.

3

IR = interquartile range.