Table 6.
Item | Diet |
SEM1 |
P-value |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Diet |
Diet × week |
Week |
|||||||
PS | SS | MS | LS | Linear | Quadratic | ||||
Starch, % | 1.83 | 2.55 | 1.82 | 1.67 | 0.39 | 0.42 | 0.86 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
pH | 6.30 | 6.31 | 6.59 | 6.58 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.41 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
Xgm, retained2 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.03 | 0.40 | 0.55 | 0.35 | 0.01 |
Sgm, retained2 | 1.11 | 1.14 | 1.14 | 1.12 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.80 | 0.13 | 0.04 |
Xgm, total3 | 0.36 | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.35 | 0.01 | 0.45 | 0.12 | 0.01 | <0.01 |
Sgm, total3 | 1.33 | 1.35 | 1.35 | 1.32 | 0.01 | 0.23 | 0.35 | 0.20 | <0.01 |
Retained, % of DM | |||||||||
3.35-mm sieve | 3.00 | 5.62 | 6.62 | 5.02 | 0.70 | 0.01 | 0.89 | 0.28 | 0.41 |
1.18-mm sieve | 6.29 | 6.92 | 5.25 | 4.37 | 0.64 | 0.04 | 0.33 | 0.50 | <0.01 |
1.00-mm sieve | 4.28 | 4.10 | 4.11 | 3.74 | 0.36 | 0.70 | 0.18 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
0.85-mm sieve | 3.11 | 2.98 | 3.05 | 2.45 | 0.26 | 0.23 | 0.95 | 0.03 | 0.10 |
0.60-mm sieve | 14.23 | 12.82 | 12.47 | 12.14 | 1.09 | 0.53 | 0.13 | <0.01 | 0.07 |
0.425-mm sieve | 21.07 | 19.40 | 19.13 | 20.21 | 0.74 | 0.26 | 0.97 | 0.01 | 0.52 |
0.15-mm sieve | 47.98 | 48.16 | 49.37 | 52.07 | 2.79 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.03 | 0.01 |
Solubles,4 % of DM | 70.20 | 72.72 | 71.50 | 71.07 | 2.22 | 0.88 | 0.50 | <0.01 | 0.23 |
Because of unequal animal numbers SE differ between treatments, the highest SEM were reported in the table.
Geometric mean (Xgm) and standard deviation (Sgm) of particle length as calculated by ASABE (2007) using data from screens ≥0.15 mm. Particles retained on the top screen were assumed to be 4.7 mm long.
Geometric mean (Xgm) and standard deviation (Sgm) of particle length as calculated by ASABE (2007) using data from all particle fractions. Particles retained on the top screen were assumed to be 4.7 mm long.
Proportion of particles that passed through the bottom screen.