Table 3.
(A&E): 1994–1998 | (A&E): 1999–2004 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | (%) | OR | 95% CI | P-value | n | (%) | OR | 95% CI | P-value | |
Overall | 51 | 57 | 95 | 56 | ||||||
HLA disparity | ||||||||||
Matched | 36 | 67 | 1 | 60 | 62 | 1 | ||||
Mismatched | 15 | 33 | 0.25 | 0.07–0.90 | 0.033 | 35 | 46 | 0.53 | 0.22–1.22 | 0.13 |
Conditioning a | ||||||||||
Bu/Cy | 30 | 54 | 1 | 36 | 53 | 1 | ||||
Bu/Cyhi | 17 | 59 | 1.25 | 0.38–4.16 | 0.72 | 13 | 77 | 2.98 | 0.70–12.67 | 0.14 |
Bu target | 4 | 75 | 2.63 | 0.24–28.20 | 0.43 | 11 | 91 | 8.95 | 1.04–77.37 | 0.046 |
Flud-based MA | — | — | — | — | — | 17 | 77 | 2.15 | 0.63–7.36 | 0.22 |
RIC | — | — | — | — | — | 18 | 11 | 0.11 | 0.02–0.56 | 0.008 |
TCD b | ||||||||||
No | 47 | 62 | — | — | — | 61 | 65 | 1 | ||
Yes | 4 | 0 | — | — | — | 24 | 29 | 0.22 | 0.08–0.61 | 0.004 |
Donor | ||||||||||
Family | 21 | 70 | 1 | 29 | 48 | 1 | ||||
Unrelated | 30 | 46 | 0.38 | 0.12–1.21 | 0.10 | 66 | 59 | 1.55 | 0.65–3.73 | 0.33 |
Source | ||||||||||
BM | 47 | 62 | 1 | 56 | 50 | 1 | ||||
PBSC | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 19 | 52 | 1.11 | 0.39–3.15 | 0.84 |
CB | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | 20 | 75 | 3.00 | 0.96–9.37 | 0.059 c |
Abbreviations: A&E=alive and engrafted; BM=bone marrow; CB=cord blood; CI=confidence interval; ERT=enzyme replacement therapy; Flud-MA=fludarabine-based myeloablative; HLA=human leucocyte antigen; OR=odds ratios; PBSC=peripheral blood stem cell; RIC=reduced-intensity conditioning; TCD=T-cell depletion.
Multivariate analysis resulted in a similar outcome (predictors of being A&E) to that found in the overall group.
aBusulfan was given in the regular myeloablative doses (16 or 20 mg/kg) p.o., unless otherwise indicated. Groups were subdivided as described in Table 1.
bCD3+ ranging from <5 × 104/kg to 107/kg.
cIn the multivariate analysis P=0.20.
P-values <0.1 were selected for multivariate analysis. Bold and italic indicates the P-value, bold alone for the OR.