Skip to main content
. 2008 Jul 16;2008(3):CD001824. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001824.pub3

Collee 1991.

Methods RCT; Randomization procedure not described
Participants Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Leiden, The Netherlands. Patients recruited from a university based outpatient clinic (median duration of pain was 8 years) and a large general practice in a rural area (median duration of pain was 18 days). 
 41 patients with iliac crest pain syndrome. Exclusion criteria were: diagnosis of sciatica, ankylosing spondylitis, malignancy, infection, spondylolysthesis, severe degenerative disc disease or fibromyalgia.
Interventions Single local injection at the point of maximal tenderness over the medial part of the iliac crest. 
 (1) Injection of 5 ml lignocaine 0.5%. 
 (2) Injection of 5 ml isotonic saline.
Outcomes Timing: at baseline and 10 minutes, 7 days, 14 days and 2 months after the injection. 
 At 14 days the mean pain score in the lignocaine group was significantly lower than in the control group. In the lignocaine group 52% of patients improved at 14 days compared to 30% in the control group. This difference was not statistically significant. Among those who improved with lignocaine, the beneficial effect continued for at least 2 months in 80% of the patients.
Notes Side effects: 2 patients in the lignocaine group and 3 in the saline group complained of a painful injection or increase of pain for some hours after the injection. Nausea some hours after the injection occurred in 2 of the patients treated with lignocaine and in 1 patient treated with saline.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear risk Randomization procedure not described
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear
Blinding? 
 All outcomes ‐ patients? Low risk  
Blinding? 
 All outcomes ‐ care providers? Low risk  
Blinding? 
 All outcomes ‐ outcome assessors Low risk  
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes ‐ drop‐outs? Low risk  
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes ‐ ITT analysis Low risk  
Similarity of baseline characteristics? Low risk  
Co‐interventions avoided or similar? Unclear risk unclear from text
Compliance acceptable? Low risk  
Timing outcome assessments similar? Low risk