Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Vasc Surg. 2019 Oct 30;71(4):1433–1446.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.08.244

Table IV.

Four key clinical tasks addressed by multidisciplinary teams

Study Bias
score (1)
OR for major
amputation
Key clinical task # tasks
addressed
Glycemic
control
Wound care Infection Vascular Disease
Surgical Non-surgical Revascularization Diagnostic/
Medically
managed
Chung 2015 20 0.45 (0.16, 1.24) X X X X X X 4
Weck 2013 18.5 0.28 (0.20, 0.40) X X X X X 4
Laakso 2017 17.5 0.47 (0.27, 0.82) X X X X X X 4
Chiu 2011 17 0.09 (0.03, 0.29) X X X X X 3
Alexandrescu 2009 16.5 0.47 (0.20, 1.08) X X X X X X 4
Crihana 2014 16.5 0.25 (0.07, 0.90) X X X X X 4
Setacci 2013 16.5 0.70 (0.50, 0.96) X X X X X 3
Kim 2018 16.5 1.14 (0.59, 2.20) X X X X X 3
Riaz 2019 16.5 0.29 (0.20, 0.42) X X X X X 3
Dargis 1999 16 0.39 (0.04, 3.55) X X X X 3
Hedetoft 2009 16 * X X X 2
Martinez-Gómez 2014 16 0.47 (0.33, 0.68) X X X X X 4
Rerkasem 2008 16 0.27 (0.08, 0.97) X X X X X 3
Williams 2018 16 −368/100,000 X X X X 2
Yesil 2009 16 0.56 (0.34, 0.93) X X X X X X 4
Cahn 2014 15.5 0.49 (0.25, 0.94) X X X X 3
Wang 2016 15.5 0.27 (0.13, 0.57) X X X X X 3
Jiménez 2017 15.5 −1.6/100,000/yr X X X X X X 4
Crane 1999 15 0.30 (0.10, 0.92) X X 2
Denjalic 2014 15 0.49 (0.30, 0.78) X X X X 3
Nather 2010 15 0.37 (0.21, 0.66) X X X X X X 4
Armstrong 2012 14.5 ** X X X X X 3
Aydin 2010 14.5 0.53 (0.25, 1.15) X X X X X X 4
Hsu 2015 14.5 0.28 (0.13, 0.60) X X X X X 3
Meltzer 2002 14.5 0.16 (0.07, 0.37) X X X X X X 4
Witsø 2010 14.5 −160/100,000/yr X X X X X X 4
Anichini 2007 14 −3.2/100,000 X X X X X 3
Gibbons 1993 13.5 0.22 (0.10, 0.47) X X X 2
Holstein 2000 13.5 −20.3/100,000 X X X X X X 4
Nason 2013 13.5 0.61 (0.23, 1.62) X X X X X X 4
Troisi 2016 11.5 −8.8/100,000 X X 1
McGill 2003 9.5 0.19 (0.13, 0.27) X X X 2
Total (%) 27 (84) 28 (88) 29 (91) 20 (63) 24 (75) 27 (84) Mean= 3.22
(1)

Studies are ordered based on bias scores, with higher quality studies listed first.

*

Hedetoft and colleagues reported a reduction in the high:low (major:minor) amputation ratio from 0.56 to 0.46 following introduction of a multidisciplinary team.

**

Armstrong and colleagues reported a reduction in the high:low (major:minor) amputation ratio from 0.35 to 0.27 following introduction of a multidisciplinary team.