Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 10;34(2):734–741. doi: 10.1111/jvim.15727

Table 2.

Results of the logistic regression model examining association between breed and positive results of Tritrichomonas foetus polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing

Breed Number (%) of cats Number (%) of cats with positive PCR test result OR 95% CI P value
Domestic 866 (55) 76 (9) 0.24 0.14‐0.42 <.001***
Bengal 205 (13) 48 (23) 0.94 0.52‐1.68 .83
Abyssinian 81 (5) 31 (38) 2.11 1.09‐4.08 .03*
Siamese 65 (4) 16 (25) 1.03 0.39‐2.47 .95
Ragdoll 61 (4) 14 (23) 1.42 0.58‐3.29 .43
Persian 38 (2) 11 (29) 1.47 0.51‐3.94 .46
Maine Coon 38 (2) 8 (21) 0.62 0.17‐1.82 .42
Sphinx 31 (2) 7 (23) 0.54 0.08‐2.14 .44
Devon Rexa 15 (1) 2 (13)
Highlandera 13 (1) 4 (31)
Burmesea 12 (1) 3 (25)
Siberiana 12 (1) 0 (0)
Savannaha 11 (1) 5 (46)
Cornish Rexa 10 (1) 5 (50)
British Shorthaira 10 (1) 1 (10)
Himalayana 10 (1) 1 (10)

Note: Odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (CI), and P value for significant association with positive results of PCR testing for T. foetus are shown for each variable. Breeds represented by fewer than 10 cats (number of cats): Norwegian Forest cat (8), Balinese (7), Exotic shorthair (7), Tonkinese (7), Birman (6), Egyptian Mau (6), Russian Blue (6), Scottish Fold (6), Ocicat (5), Oriental shorthair (5), Manx (4), Somali (4), Japanese Bobtail (3), Pixie‐bob (3), Bombay (2), Cheetoh (2), Havanese (2), Singapura (2), Australian Mist cat (1), Chartreux (1), Ragamuffin (1), Serval (1), Snowshoe (1), Thai (1), Turkish Angora (1).

a

Breeds represented by fewer than 30 cats were combined and used as the baseline category for the logistic regression model.