Skip to main content
. 2005 Apr 17;37(5):507–513. doi: 10.1038/ng1550

Table 1.

Association of DCSIGN1-336 in three independent cohorts from Thailand

Genotype distribution
Number Frequency (%) Cases versus controls a DHF versus DF a
Cohort and group GG GA AA GG GA AA OR P b OR (95% c.i.) P b
RA cohort
Control 5 51 240 1.7 17.2 81.1
DEN 4 39 190 1.5 17.3 81.2 0.970 0.98
DF 0 1 50 0.0 2.0 98.0 0.090 0.0012 14.31 (3.34–61.23) 2.3 × 10−4
DHF 4 38 140 2.2 20.9 76.9 1.286 0.33
SI cohort
Control 1 44 169 0.5 20.6 79.0
DEN 0 49 190 0.0 20.5 79.5 0.968 0.98
DF 0 6 66 0.0 8.3 91.7 0.344 0.018 3.79 (1.62–8.87) 0.0024
DHF 0 43 124 0.0 25.7 74.3 1.302 0.34
KK cohort
Control 3 31 149 1.6 16.9 81.4
DEN 0 16 114 0.0 12.3 87.7 0.616 0.18
DF 0 0 27 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.008 0.012 99.75 (12.70–783.54) 0.037
DHF 0 16 87 0.0 15.5 84.5 0.807 0.63

The SI and KK cohorts were replication cohorts. c.i., confidence interval; DEN, all individuals with dengue disease; DF, dengue fever; DHF, dengue hemorrhagic fever.

a The combined group of homozygotes with respect to the rare allele and heterozygotes was compared with the group of homozygotes with respect to the frequent allele.

bTwo-sided exact Fisher test.