Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 27;98(3):skaa064. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa064

Table 7.

Effect of protein source and xylanase supplementation on ileum and colon pH, ATTD of nutrients, relative organ weight, and SCFA in the mid colon of nursery pigs1

Traits Least square means for main effects
Protein source effect Xylanase effect Protein × xylanase interaction
Without xylanase With xylanase SEM P-value
SBM RCM DCM CCM with without SBM RCM DCM CCM SBM RCM DCM CCM
pH
 Ileum2 6.35 6.36 6.50 6.66 6.66x 6.27y 6.08 6.18 6.25 6.54 6.61 6.55 6.73 6.76 0.16 0.733
 Colon3,5 5.92x 5.68y 6.02x 5.73y 5.93x 5.74y 5.73 5.78 5.76 5.65 6.05 5.78 6.54 5.80 0.12 0.300
Digestibility, %
 CP 75 71 72 72 75x 70y 73 68 70 70 78 73 75 73 1.54 0.471
 NDF4 37 30 33 30 33 33 37 28 30 36 37 31 38 24 3.19 0.042
 DM 81x 76y 77y 78xy 80x 77y 79 74 75 77 83 77 79 80 1.51 0.937
 P 51 44 47 46 49x 45y 52 42 41 44 51 47 51 48 2.82 0.075
 Ca 66x 52y 57xy 54y 62x 52y 64 49 48 46 67 56 62 63 3.49 0.265
Organ weight, g/kg/BW
 Heart6 5.64 5.63 5.53 5.27 5.58 5.45 5.76 5.50 5.33 5.18 5.69 5.77 6.08 5.28 0.33 0.845
 Lungs 12.88 12.82 12.64 12.85 13.34 12.26 12.33 13.05 12.15 11.45 13.25 12.60 15.18 14.09 0.61 0.494
 Thyroid 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.12 0.04 0.04 0.10 0.05 0.08 0.06 0.03 0.252
 Liver 34.0y 36.6x 37.1x 35.0y 36.3x 35.1y 33.9 36.7 36.0 33.7 33.5 37.0 37.3 36.1 0.68 0.175
 Spleen7 2.57x 2.28x 1.96y 1.92y 2.36x 2.01y 2.28 2.25 1.72 1.76 2.87 2.32 2.20 2.90 0.27 0.484
 Kidney15 6.09 6.02 6.74 5.96 6.39 6.02 6.13 6.12 6.60 5.34 5.92 6.03 6.70 6.45 0.26 0.132
 Stomach 8.04 7.90 8.49 7.62 7.94 8.09 8.47 8.20 8.03 7.40 7.55 7.64 8.41 7.98 0.40 0.093
 Small intestine8 44.48 44.33 46.31 44.94 44.26 45.27 46.20 44.22 44.88 40.82 42.79 41.52 45.31 40.25 1.78 0.330
 Large intestine 20.06 19.87 20.37 19.63 18.85 21.12 20.80 19.42 22.36 21.24 18.99 19.13 19.80 18.40 1.47 0.954
SCFA14, mM
 Total SCFA 135.2 138.9 126.0 125.3 129.3 133.4 141.4 139.1 130.2 122.6 129.1 138.4 120.4 128.3 9.62 0.647
 Acetic acid12,13 54.4 56.3 50.2 53.8 55.2 52.2 52.9 53.8 51.5 47.4 56.2 52.9 49.3 55.3 1.19 0.089
 Propionic acid11 36.2y 41.0x 36.2y 32.9z 34.7y 38.4x 38.2 40.3 39.1 34.3 32.6 39.7 32.3 33.0 3.11 0.018
 Butyric acid16 17.6 17.5 16.3 17.2 15.5 18.8 20.4 19.4 16.0 20.0 14.3 16.4 16.0 14.9 2.17 0.449
 Valeric acid 1.7y 3.7x 3.6x 2.5xy 2.7 3.1 1.7 4.1 3.3 2.9 1.5 3.2 3.4 2.0 0.63 0.277
 Lactic acid9 5.2 3.0 5.0 4.7 5.1 3.9 5.8 2.0 3.4 4.6 5.3 3.9 6.8 5.1 1.05 0.698
 BCFA10 2.3 1.5 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.9 2.6 1.8 1.8 1.6 2.0 1.1 1.6 1.7 0.40 0.650
 VFA 130.0 135.7 120.6 120.8 124.1 129.5 136.2 136.3 126.0 118.8 123.7 134.9 113.6 123.2 9.77 0.648

1Based on the MIXED procedure analysis. Fixed effects included protein source, xylanase, sex, two- and three-way interactions. Random effects included block and interactions of block with the three fixed effects. Single-sex pens were used, 3 pens per sex.

2Tendency for higher (P < 0.10; SEM 0.12) ileal pH in barrows (6.56 vs. 6.37) compared with gilts.

3Tendency (P < 0.10) in the interaction protein × sex for colon pH.

4Xylanase × sex interaction (P < 0.05) for NDF digestibility.

5Three-way interaction protein–xylanase–sex (P < 0.05) for colon pH.

6Protein × sex interaction (P < 0.05) for relative weight of heart.

7Tendency in the protein × sex interaction (P < 0.10) for the relative weight of spleen.

8Tendency in the xylanase × sex interaction (P < 0.10) for the relative weight of the small intestine.

9Nonvolatile.

10Branched-chain fatty acids include isovaleric, isobutyric, and 2-methyl-butyric acids.

11Protein × sex interaction (P < 0.0001) for propionic acid.

12Tendency in the interaction protein × sex (P < 0.10) for the levels of acetic and lactic acid.

13Tendency in the interaction of xylanase × sex, protein source, and xylanase effect (P < 0.10) for the levels of acetic acid.

14Three-way interaction protein–xylanase–sex (P < 0.05) for acetic and propionic acid.

15Tendency for protein source and xylanase effect (P < 0.10) for relative weight of kidney.

16Tendency for xylanase effect (P < 0.10) for butyric acid concentration.

x–zMain effect means sharing a common letter within a factor are not significantly different using a t-test (P < 0.05).