Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 10;5(11):5951–5958. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b04302

Table 7. Comparison between QSAR Models for the HLA Data Set.

descriptors model variables/LVs Rtraining2 RSMEtraining qloo2 Rtest2 refs
1 QTMS–ADFQ GA–PLS 3 0.648 0.59 0.561 0.50 Hemmateenejad et al.20
2 ATS/QTMS GA–PLS 6 0.782 0.47 0.682 0.50 Yousefinejad et al.29
3 additive PLS 3 0.85 NR 0.54 0.64 Doytchinova et al.33
4 global GA–MLR   0.43 0.75a NR 0.42 Doytchinova et al.33
5 z scales GA–MLR   0.67 0.59a NR 0.50 Doytchinova et al.33
6 NDV MLR 9 0.540 0.664 0.407 0.535 this work
7 NDV MLR (after removing outliers) 9 0.702 0.452 0.632 0.712 this work
8 NDV MLR (after removing outliers and omitting nonsignificant variables) 5 0.690 0.461 0.642 0.713 this work
a

Standard error of estimate (SEE).