Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 26;22:32. doi: 10.1186/s13058-020-01267-w

Table 3.

Comparison of immune cell subset infiltration in pure ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinoma

Hormone receptor status Immune cell subset Pure DCIS (n = 231) Invasive carcinoma (n = 359) p value
Total CD4+ TIL 19.3 (4.0–47.8) 85.5 (41.0–176.5) < 0.001
CD8+ TIL 12.3 (5.3–25.0) 91.5 (42.0–199.3) < 0.001
FOXP3+ TIL 0 (0–1.0) 9.0 (4.0–19.0) < 0.001
PD-L1+ IC 34/221 (15.4) 153/350 (43.7) < 0.001
Positive CD4+ TIL 17.0 (3.7–43.3) 79.0 (38.3–152.0) < 0.001
CD8+ TIL 11.7 (5.3–22.0) 68.5 (34.0–139.3) < 0.001
FOXP3+ TIL 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 6.5 (3.0–16.8) < 0.001
PD-L1+ IC 26/196 (13.3) 72/242 (29.8) < 0.001
Negative CD4+ TIL 35.0 (18.0–86.5) 125.0 (48.8–209.3) < 0.001
CD8+ TIL 22.7 (9.2–48.8) 160.0 (81.8–278.3) < 0.001
FOXP3+ TIL 1.0 (0.0–5.0) 15.0 (7.0–28.0) < 0.001
PD-L1+ IC 8/25 (32.0) 81/108 (75.0) < 0.001

For CD4+, CD8+ and FOXP3+ TILs, p values were calculated by the Mann-Whitney U test, and data are presented as median (interquartile range)

For PD-L1+ IC, p values were calculated by chi-square or Fisher’s exact test, and data are presented as frequency (%)

TIL tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte, IC immune cell, DCIS ductal carcinoma in situ