Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 11;2013(6):CD002116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002116.pub2

Hallgren 1994 #.

Methods Cross‐over randomised controlled trial.
Participants 30 adults (8 women) with ileoanal pouches (16 handsewn and 14 stapled), performed for ulcerative colitis. Groups combined for analysis
 Median age: 38 years (range 26 to 61)
 Exclusion criteria: not specified
Interventions A: loperamide 4 mg three times a day
 B: placebo 
 Duration of treatment: 8 day treatment periods with 7 day washout period.
 Dose titration: no
Outcomes Number experiencing soiling, day: A: 3/28, B: 7/28; night: A: 1/28, B: 11/28
 Number using pads, day: A: 1/28, B: 3/28; night: A: 1/28, B: 6/28
 Defecation frequency (n, mean, SD): A: 28, 4.24 (1.86), B: 28, 6.43 (1.99)
 Anal canal resting pressure, mm Hg (n, mean, SD): A: 28, 62 (16), B: 28, 55 (9)
 Anal canal maximum squeeze pressure, mm Hg, (n, mean, SD): A: 28, 223 (82), B: 28, 219 (93)
 Pouch volumetry and contractility.
 Sensory threshold, rectal balloon distension, cm water, for 'sensation of filling' and 'defecation urge' (n, mean, SD): A: 28, 30 (12), B: 28, 27 (15)
 Recto/pouch ‐ anal reflex inhibition on distension.
 No adverse effects.
Notes Patients were asked to keep to usual meal times and diet.
 Data from two groups combined, and converted from medians and 95% CIs to means and SDs.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not specified
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not specified
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Reported as "double blinded" and used "identical capsule" therefore participants must be blinded. Not sure about personnel
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No complete data
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Protocol not available
Was use of a cross over design appropriate? Low risk Seems appropriate with seven days washout period in between.
Is it clear that the order of receiving treatment was randomised? Unclear risk Method of randomisation not specified
Can it be assumed that the trial was not biased from carry over effects? Low risk There was seven days washout period