Table 4. Longitudinal models examining the effect of BMI and weight discrimination on Time 2 relationship initiationa.
All (n = 369) | Female (n = 259) | Male (n = 110) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | 95% CI | P.value | OR | 95% CI | P.value | OR | 95% CI | P.value | |
Gender | |||||||||
Female | (ref) | ||||||||
Male | 0.92 | (0.53, 1.59) | 0.764 | ||||||
Race/ethnicity | |||||||||
Non-Hispanic White | (ref) | (ref) | (ref) | ||||||
Other | 0.66 | (0.36, 1.21) | 0.181 | 0.64 | (0.35, 1.16) | 0.139 | 0.65 | (0.19, 2.14) | 0.474 |
Pell Grant Status | |||||||||
No | (ref) | (ref) | (ref) | ||||||
Yes | 0.64 | (0.31, 1.32) | 0.225 | 0.66 | (0.30, 1.44) | 0.293 | 0.65 | (0.14, 3.00) | 0.577 |
BMI | 0.91 | (0.85, 0.96) | 0.001 | 0.86 | (0.78, 0.95) | 0.003 | 0.98 | (0.90, 1.07) | 0.677 |
Weight Discrimination | |||||||||
No | (ref) | (ref) | (ref) | ||||||
Yes | 1.27 | (0.69, 2.35) | 0.438 | 1.57 | (0.74, 3.34) | 0.243 | 0.76 | (0.24, 2.42) | 0.637 |
a Relationship Status: 1 = in a relationship, 0 = not in a relationship
Bold indicates significant finding (P<0.05)