Table 5. Longitudinal models examining the effect of BMI and weight stigma on Time 2 relationship terminationa.
All (n = 181) | Female (n = 139)b | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | 95% CI | P.value | OR | 95% CI | P.value | |
Gender | ||||||
Female | (ref) | |||||
Male | 1.46 | (0.62, 3.4) | 0.383 | |||
Race/ethnicity | ||||||
Non-Hispanic White | (ref) | (ref) | ||||
Other | 0.75 | (0.38, 1.48) | 0.411 | 1.13 | (0.53, 2.41) | 0.751 |
Pell Grant Status | ||||||
No | (ref) | (ref) | ||||
Yes | 1.37 | (0.71, 2.64) | 0.353 | 1.57 | (0.72, 3.39) | 0.253 |
BMI | 0.96 | (0.89, 1.02) | 0.176 | 0.98 | (0.91, 1.06) | 0.618 |
Weight Discrimination | ||||||
No | (ref) | (ref) | ||||
Yes | 0.73 | (0.38, 1.42) | 0.359 | 0.58 | (0.29, 1.15) | 0.119 |
a Relationship Status: 1 = in a relationship, 0 = not in a relationship
b The stratification for male was not run given the small sample size (n = 42)