Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 26;15(3):e0230806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230806

Table 5. Longitudinal models examining the effect of BMI and weight stigma on Time 2 relationship terminationa.

All (n = 181) Female (n = 139)b
OR 95% CI P.value OR 95% CI P.value
Gender
Female (ref)
Male 1.46 (0.62, 3.4) 0.383
Race/ethnicity
Non-Hispanic White (ref) (ref)
Other 0.75 (0.38, 1.48) 0.411 1.13 (0.53, 2.41) 0.751
Pell Grant Status
No (ref) (ref)
Yes 1.37 (0.71, 2.64) 0.353 1.57 (0.72, 3.39) 0.253
BMI 0.96 (0.89, 1.02) 0.176 0.98 (0.91, 1.06) 0.618
Weight Discrimination
No (ref) (ref)
Yes 0.73 (0.38, 1.42) 0.359 0.58 (0.29, 1.15) 0.119

a Relationship Status: 1 = in a relationship, 0 = not in a relationship

b The stratification for male was not run given the small sample size (n = 42)