Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 26;15(3):e0230632. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230632

Table 2. BfArM’s ADR-database analysis: Characteristics of validated ACEi angioedema cases and validated ACEi controls.

BfArM’s ADR-database analysis characteristics of validated ACEi angioedema cases and validated controls validated ACEi angioedema cases versus validated ACEi controls
validated ACEi angioedema cases (n = 121) validated ACEi controls (n = 242) unadjusted OR [+/- 95% CI] logistic regression OR [+/- 95% CI] logistic regression p-values logistic regression + imputation (MICE) p-values
completeness score a 0.74 [0.65–0.82] 0.71 [0.65–0.77] - - - -
patient demographics b
mean age (median) 64.5 (68) 63.5 (65) - 1.5 [0.9–2.7]´ 0.121 0.099
[years] -
female 46.3% (56) 55.8% (135) 0.7 [0.4–1.0] 0.9 [0.5–1.5] 0.569 0.665
male 53.7% (65) % (105)
smoking and drinking
habits, allergic
conditions
smoker c 14.0% (17) 3.3% (8) 4.8 [2.0–11.4]* 2.7 [1.0–7.6] 0.058 0.043*
alcohol consumption d 9.1% (11) 2.5% (6) 3.9 [1.4–10.9]* 2.9 [0.8–10.4] 0.098 0.088
allergy e 12.4% (15) 10.3% (25) 1.2 [0.6–2.4] 1.0 [0.5–2.3] 0.942 0.988
angioedema f 24.0% (29) - - - - -
comorbidities g
renal disorders 9.9% (12) 8.7% (21) 1.2 [0.5–2.4] 1.0 [0.4–2.3] 0.953 0.749
diabetes 15.7% (19) 13.2% (32) 1.2 [0.7–2.3] 1.1 [0.5–2.2] 0.892 0.951
asthma/COPD 9.1% (11) 6.2% (15) 1.5 [0.7–3.4] 1.8 [0.7–4.8] 0.253 0.231
administered ACEi h
ramipril 67.8% (82) 75.2% (182) 0.7 [0.4–1.1] 1.4 [0.4–5.0] 0.620 0.997
enalapril 16.5% (20) 12.4% (30) 1.4 [0.8–2.6] 1.4 [0.4–5.8] 0.607 0.822
lisinopril 10.7% (13) 9.1% (22) 1.2 [0.6–2.5] 1.5 [0.4–6.7] 0.563 0.770
comedication i
β-Blocker 28.1% (34) 23.1% (56) 1.3 [0.8–2.1] 1.6 [0.8–3.0] 0.165 0.275
diuretics 13.2% (16) 17.4% (42) 0.7 [0.4–1.4] 0.4 [0.2–0.8]* 0.023* 0.023*
calcium antagonists 17.4% (21) 9.1% (22) 2.1 [1.1–4.0]* 1.6 [0.7–3.3] 0.248 0.181
NSAID 21.5% (26) 19.8% (48) 1.1 [0.6–1.9] 0.5 [0.3–1.0] 0.057 0.083
everolimus 5.8% (7) 0.0% (0) - - - -
alteplase 0.8% (1) 0.0% (0) - - - -
seriousness criteria j
serious 89.3% (108) 53.7% (130) 7.2 [3.8–13.4]* 7.7 [3.9–15.1]* < 0.001* < 0.001*
death 3.3% (4) 1.2% (3) 2.7 [0.6–12.4] - - -
life-threatening 28.9% (35) 5.0% (12) 2.8 [1.6–4.8]* - - -
hospitalization 49.6% (60) 28.5% (69) 2.5 [1.6–3.9]* - - -
disabling 0.8% (1) 5.0% (12) 0.2 [0.0–1.2] - - -

*OR = 1 is not included; OR > 1 reported more often in validated ACEi angioedema cases; OR < 1 reported more often in validated ACEi controls

a in cases and controls, most data referring to the variable "time to onset" was incomplete or missing. The calculation of the completeness score is described in the Methods section: 2.2.3. BfArM’s ADR-database: documentation quality of validated cases.

b validated ACEi angioedema cases: age unknown in 21 reports, gender unknown in 2 reports.

c refers to current smoking at the time of the reported ADR. Former smokers were classified as non-smokers.

d information about the amount of alcohol consumed (daily/weekly) was rare and may not have been reported. It was not possible to classify the cases in patients with a high or moderate alcohol consumption due to inaccurate information. Therefore, all cases in which any alcohol consumption was reported were counted, independent of the amount.

e the term "allergy" refers to a reported allergy and the occurrence of any allergic and hypersensitivity reactions reported in the history of the patient.

f the term "angioedema" summarizes previous angioedema or swellings coded in the SMQ "angioedema (narrow)" reported in the history of the patient.

g refers to renal disorders, diabetes, asthma/COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) reported in the patients’ history or as a drug indication term for the used comedication.

h the three ACEi monosubstances most frequently reported as "suspected/interacting" are tabulated. The remaining ACEi (not listed) were reported fewer than 5 times.

i the analysis of the most frequently reported and most relevant comedications is based on monosubstances and combination products of the tabulated drug substances and/or drug classes and corresponds to the ATC classification. All drugs co-reported to the "suspected/interacting" ACEi were counted as "concomitant", regardless of whether they were reported as "suspected", "interacting" or "concomitant".

j One ADR report may yield information about more than one seriousness criterion, therefore, the number of reported seriousness criteria exceeds that of the ADR reports.