TABLE IV.

COMPARISON WITH STATE OF THE ART METHODS ON STARE.

No	Methods	Year	Se	Sp	Acc
1	Hoover [22]	2000	0.6747	0.9565	0.9264
2	Jiang [12]	2003	N.A	N.A	0.9009
3	Staal [3]	2004	N.A	N.A	0.9516
4	Mendonca [13]	2006	0.6996	0.9730	0.9440
5	Soares [2]	2006	0.7207	0.9747	0.9479
6	Ricci [4]	2007	N.A	N.A	0.9584
7	Al-Diri [14]	2009	0.7521	0.9681	N.A
8	Lam [15]	2010	N.A	N.A	0.9567
9	Fraz [17]	2011	0.7311	0.9680	0.9442
10	You [18]	2011	0.7260	0.9756	0.9497
11	Fraz [6]	2012	0.7548	0.9763	0.9534
12	Azzopardi [19]	2015	0.7716	0.9701	0.9563
13	Li [8]	2016	0.7726	0.9844*	0.9628
14	Liskowski [9]	2016	0.7620	0.9789	0.9571
15	Zhang [10]	2016	0.7791	0.9758	0.9554
16	Ours	2018	0.8600*	0.9754	0.9667*
17	Ours (Cross trained)	2018	0.7841	0.9749	0.9606