. 2020 Mar 25;98(3):skaa070. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa070

Table 4.

In the genus level, the relative abundance of the bacterial communities from HFI, MFI, and LFI groups, %

Items	LFI(n = 6)¹	MFI (n = 6)	HFI (n = 6)	SEM	P-value
Prevotella	64.52	63.25	54.73	2.11	0.12
Gammaproteobacteria_unclassified	10.90	4.79	10.50	1.56	0.21
Lachnospiraceae_unclassified	3.12^b	2.73^b	5.46^a	0.47	0.03
Prevotellaceae_unclassified	2.92	3.77	2.80	0.23	0.19
Bacteroidales_unclassified	2.35^b	3.69^a	2.26^b	0.28	0.06
Bacteroidetes_unclassified	2.18	3.51	2.53	0.31	0.20
Ruminococcaceae_unclassified	1.51	1.32	2.11	0.18	0.18
Fibrobacter	0.66	1.66	1.49	0.28	0.33
Treponema	0.68	1.65	1.15	0.20	0.15
Paraprevotella	0.79^b	1.73^a	0.75^b	0.20	0.06
Porphyromonadaceae_unclassified	0.81	1.35	1.07	0.13	0.27
Clostridiales_unclassified	0.86	0.77	1.25	0.12	0.21
Succiniclasticum	0.81^a	0.49^b	1.17^a	0.09	0.00
Ruminococcus	0.63	0.55	1.02	0.10	0.13
Firmicutes_unclassified	0.57	0.70	0.92	0.09	0.26
Selenomonas	0.63	0.65	0.83	0.11	0.72
Veillonellaceae_unclassified	0.48^b	0.31^b	0.83^a	0.08	0.02
Butyrivibrio	0.35^b	0.44^b	0.62^a	0.05	0.09
Erysipelotrichaceae_unclassified	0.18^b	0.32^a	0.32^a	0.03	0.04
Saccharofermentants	0.20^b	0.24^b	0.38^a	0.03	0.03

¹ n = number of cows.

^a,bDifferent superscript letters within rows suggest that means differ significantly (P < 0.05).