Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 26;87(Suppl 1):37–49. doi: 10.1038/s41390-020-0781-1

Table 2.

MRI evaluation scales of the severity of preterm WMI.

Miller et al.14 Woodward et al.7 Kidokoro et al.15 Martinez-Biarge et al.10
Study Prospective Prospective Prospective Retrospective
Population (n) Gestational age (mean) BW (g)

32 VLWB

29 weeks

167 VLBW. Two cohorts.

27.3 weeks; BW 1014

27.1weeks; BW 948

Two cohorts

97 preterm (<30 weeks)

(26.7 weeks; BW 949)

22 term healthy

(39.1 week; BW 3285)

82 (62 with 2 MRI studies)

(29.8 weeks; BW 1453)

Period 2000–2002

Two cohorts:

1998–2000 New Zealand; 2001–2002 Melbourne

2007–2010 2003–2014
Age MRI (PMA = postmenstrual age in weeks)

Two sequential studies

Early (31.9 weeks PMA)

At term (36.5 weeks PMA)

Term equivalent age 36–42 weeks PMA

138 sequential studies

Early (0–2 weeks)

Intermediate (2–6 weeks)

TEAa (<16 weeks)

MRI acquisition 1.5 T (T1 SE, T2 SE) 1.5 T (T1, T2) 3 T (T1, FSE T2) 1.5 T (T1 IR, T2 DWI)
WM evaluation Number and size of foci of hyperintensity on T1

Five variables (scores 1–3)

1. WM abnormality

2. Periventricular WM loss

3. Cystic abnormality

4. Ventricular dilatation

5. Thinning of corpus callosum

Six variables (0–4)

1. Cystic lesions

2. Focal abnormality

3. Myelination delay

4. Thinning of corpus callosum

5. Dilated ventricles

6. Volume reduction

Variables depending on MRI

0–2 weeks after birth: focal lesions (T1/DWI)

2–6 weeks after birth: focal or cystic lesions

TEAa: focal (T1) or cystic, myelination, volume reduction

WMI global score

1. Normal

2. Minimal: 3 or fewer foci <2 mm

3. Moderate: 3 or more foci or area >2 mm, but <5% of the hemisphere

4. Severe: >5% of the hemisphere

1. Normal (scores 5 and 6)

2. Mild (scores 7–9)

3. Moderate (scores 10–12)

4. Severe (scores 13–15)

1. No lesion (scores 0 and 2)

2. Mild (scores 3 and 4)

3. Moderate (scores 5 and 6)

4. Severe (score ≥7)

(a score for gray matter and a global brain score are added)

Four grades of WMI taking into account the moment of evaluation
Volume loss evaluation No Yes Yes Yes (TEAa)
Evaluation Two blinded pediatric neuroradiologist Two blinded investigators (neuroradiologist, neonatologist) Single neonatal neurologist (inter- and intraobserver reliability in 20 studies >90%) NR
Cortical gray matter evaluation No

1. Signal abnormality

2. Quality of gyral maturation

3. Size of subarachnoid space

1. Signal abnormality

2. Delayed gyration

3. Dilated extracerebral CSF space

No
Deep gray matter evaluation No No Size and signal intensity of basal ganglia and thalami in an axial section No
Cerebellum evaluation No No Transcerebellar diameter and cerebellar signal intensity No
Incidence of WMI

56% with WMI:

• 31% mild

• 21.8% moderate

• 3% severe

72% with WMI

• 51% mild

• 17% moderate

• 4% severe

(49% with gray matter lesions)

24% with WMI

(24% with cerebellar injury)

Selected population
Follow-up

No

(comparison with CUS findings only)

Yes

Moderate and severe WMI predicted adverse otucome

No No

aTerm equivalent age.