Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 28;50(4):335–343. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-01963-2

Table 1.

Adjuvant chemotherapy

Author/trial Study period No. of PDAC patients Regimen MST Hazard ratio p
Bakkevold 1984–1987 47 5-FU + doxorubicin + mitomycin vs. no adjuvant treatment OS: 23 vs. 11 M 0.02
Takada 1986–1992 158 5-FU + mitomycin C vs. no adjuvant treatment

5-year OS: 11.5 vs. 18.0%

5-year DFS: 8.6 vs. 7.8%

NS
Kosuge/JSAP-01 1992–2000 89 5-FU + cisplatin vs. no adjuvant treatment

OS: 12.5 vs. 15.8 M

5-year OS: 26.4 vs. 14.9%

0.94
Neoptolemos/ESPAC-1 1994–2000 289

5-FU vs. no adjuvant chemotherapy

5-FU + radiation vs. no adjuvant CRT

OS: 20.1 vs. 15.5 M

OS: 15.9 vs. 17.9 M

0.71

1.28

0.009

0.05

Oettle/CONKO-001 1998–2004 354 GEM (6 M) vs. no adjuvant treatment

DFS: 13.4 vs. 6.7 M

OS: 22.8 vs. 20.2 M

0.55

0.76

< 0.001

0.01

Ueno/JSAP-02 2002–2005 118 GEM (3 M) vs. no adjuvant treatment

DFS: 11.4 vs. 5 M

OS: 22.3 vs. 18.4 M

0.60

0.77

0.01

0.19

Neoptolemos/ESPAC-3 2000–2008 434 5-FU vs. GEM OS: 23.0 vs. 23.6 M 0.94 0.39
Uesaka/JASPAC 01 2007–2010 385 S-1 vs. GEM

OS: 46.5 vs. 25.5 M

5-year OS: 44.1 vs. 24.4%

0.57 < 0.0001
Neoptolemos/ESPAC-4 2008–2014 730 GEM + capecitabine vs. GEM

DFS: 13.9 vs. 13.1

OS: 28.0 vs. 25.5 M

0.82

0.082

0.032

Conroy/PRODIGE 24/CCTG PA.6 2012–2016 493 mFOLFIRINOX vs. GEM

DFS: 21.6 vs. 12.8 M

OS: 54.4 vs. 35.0 M

0.58

0.64

< 0.0001

0.003

Phase III trials of adjuvant chemotherapy