Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 20;11:402. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00402

Table 4.

Evaluation of commercial qPCR master-mixes by cDNA derived standards.

QIAGEN R2 SYBR master-mix QIAGEN QuantiNOVA SYBR master-mix Bio-Rad ssoAdvanced SYBR master-mix Applied biosystems PowerUp SYBR master-mix
Transcript E′ (%) Dynamic range (cells/reaction) R2 E′ (%) Dynamic range (cells/reaction) R2 E′ (%) Dynamic range (cells/reaction) R2 E′ (%) Dynamic range (cells/reaction) R2
RPL13a 95.2 100–103 0.99 78.9 100–103 0.99 93.7 100–104 0.99 104.9 100–103 0.99
SDHA 79.9 100–103 0.99 85.7 100–103 0.99 98.3 100–104 0.99 121.5 100–103 0.99
TBP 134.7 102–104 0.99 99.1 102–104 0.99 95.9 101–104 0.99 109.7 102–104 0.99
IFN–γ 88.3 101–103 0.99 91.2 101–103 0.99 96.1 101–104 0.99 121.9 100–103 0.99
Master-mix failure rate 75.0% 50.0% 0.0% 50.0%
Overall failure rate 43.8%

Commerical qPCR master-mixes were evaluated with logarithmically diluted PBMC cDNA (104-101 cell cDNA equivalent per reaction). Assay performance, i.e., reaction efficiency (E′), limit of detection (LOD) and standard coefficient of determination (R2) determined as per MIQE guidelines. Biological replicates (n = 3) were extracted with single reverse transcription reactions per extraction, and measured in qPCR technical triplicate. RNA extractions were repeated. E′, Dynamic Range and R2 calculated from a representative technical extraction, calculated from the mean of a qPCR technical replicate. Failure rate calculated as percentage outside accceptable E′ (90–110%).