Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 20;11:258. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00258

TABLE 3.

Comparison of nuclear exon target capture and alignment statistics* across comparable data matrixes (on-target coding only) in herbariomic studies.

Study Probe set Target loci Sample type (Herb/Other) Collection year Mean reads per sample Reads on target (%) Capture success (%) Alignment length Mean PPIC (%) Missing data (%)
Hart et al., 2016 Leguminosae (specific) 214 11/2 1835–2009 1,241,592 79.9 89 229,995 6.7 22.4
Vatanparast et al., 2018 Leguminosae (specific) 507 12/13 1985–2014 6,356,207 32 81.9 737,309 18.3 19.7
Villaverde et al., 2018 Euphorbia (specific) 431 56/88 1891–2014 1,036,822 48.6 26.8 486,878 8 23.3
Soto Gomez et al., 2019 Dioscoreaceae (specific) 260 22/3 1994–2007 922,847 31.6 93.8 276,920 24 5.2
Larridon et al., 2020 Angiosperms (universal) 353 30/8 1948–2017 5,155,095 8.5 33.2 233,429 9.9 40.4
Murphy et al., 2020 Angiosperms (universal) 353 31/194 1835–2019 1,633,509 5.6 59.3 160,320 13.6 9.6
Shee et al., this study Angiosperms (universal) 353 68/6 1850–2018 946,130 11.5 28.2 194,215 17 27.1

Calculated from published results, including Supplementary Material.