TABLE 3.
Comparison of nuclear exon target capture and alignment statistics* across comparable data matrixes (on-target coding only) in herbariomic studies.
Study | Probe set | Target loci | Sample type (Herb/Other) | Collection year | Mean reads per sample | Reads on target (%) | Capture success (%) | Alignment length | Mean PPIC (%) | Missing data (%) |
Hart et al., 2016 | Leguminosae (specific) | 214 | 11/2 | 1835–2009 | 1,241,592 | 79.9 | 89 | 229,995 | 6.7 | 22.4 |
Vatanparast et al., 2018 | Leguminosae (specific) | 507 | 12/13 | 1985–2014 | 6,356,207 | 32 | 81.9 | 737,309 | 18.3 | 19.7 |
Villaverde et al., 2018 | Euphorbia (specific) | 431 | 56/88 | 1891–2014 | 1,036,822 | 48.6 | 26.8 | 486,878 | 8 | 23.3 |
Soto Gomez et al., 2019 | Dioscoreaceae (specific) | 260 | 22/3 | 1994–2007 | 922,847 | 31.6 | 93.8 | 276,920 | 24 | 5.2 |
Larridon et al., 2020 | Angiosperms (universal) | 353 | 30/8 | 1948–2017 | 5,155,095 | 8.5 | 33.2 | 233,429 | 9.9 | 40.4 |
Murphy et al., 2020 | Angiosperms (universal) | 353 | 31/194 | 1835–2019 | 1,633,509 | 5.6 | 59.3 | 160,320 | 13.6 | 9.6 |
Shee et al., this study | Angiosperms (universal) | 353 | 68/6 | 1850–2018 | 946,130 | 11.5 | 28.2 | 194,215 | 17 | 27.1 |
∗Calculated from published results, including Supplementary Material.